Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24227592›Full record

ArticleJournal of interpersonal violence2014

Gender, power, and intimate partner violence: a study on couples from rural Malawi.

Amy A Conroy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interpersonal violence, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. An Updated and Revised Dyadic Model of Partner Violence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy A ConroyUniversity of Colorado Denver, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Young Adults' Strategies for Navigating Reproduction in an AIDS EpidemicR01HD058366 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI TRINITAPOLI, JENNY A · 2008 to 2012
$2.7M
The Relationship Between HIV and Fertility in a Context of Expanding ART AccessR01HD077873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI TRINITAPOLI, JENNY A · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Understanding the Role of Relationship Power in HIV Testing Behavior: A Study ofF31MH093260 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI CONROY, AMY ANNE · 2010 to 2012
$59k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD058366NICHD NIH HHS R01-HD058366NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD077873NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH093260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender-based power imbalances are perhaps the most compelling underlying explanation for intimate partner violence (IPV) among women in sub-Saharan Africa. However, an overemphasis on female victimization results in an incomplete understanding of men's experiences as victims and the broader dyadic context in which violence occurs. This study examines the role of three domains of relationship power (power resources, processes, and outcomes) on sexual and physical IPV victimization in a unique sample of 466 young couples from Malawi. Two power resources were studied, namely, income and education level. Power processes were captured with a measure of couple communication and collaboration called unity. Power outcomes included a measure of relationship dominance (male dominated or female-dominated/egalitarian). Multilevel logistic regression using the Actor Partner Interpersonal Model framework was used to test whether respondent and partner data were predictive of IPV. The findings show that unity and male dominance were salient power factors that influenced young people's risk for sexual IPV. Unity had a stronger protective effect on sexual IPV for women than for men. Involvement in a male-dominated relationship increased the risk of sexual IPV for women, but decreased the risk for men. The findings also showed that education level and unity were protective against physical IPV for both men and women. Contrary to what was expected, partner data did not play a role in the respondent's experience of IPV. The consistency of these findings with the literature, theory, and study limitations are discussed.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPower, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCrime VictimsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedRural PopulationSex FactorsSex OffensesSocioeconomic FactorsViolenceAPIMMalawiphysical abusepowersexual coercion

Identifiers

PMID24227592
PMCPMC3946893
OpenAlexW1985880276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.