ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2014
Investigation of nerve injury through microfluidic devices.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic platforms for probing spontaneous functional recovery in hierarchically modular neuronal networks.Communications engineering · 2026Article
- Nervous System-on-Chip: Innovative Microfluidic Platform to Compartmentalize hiPSC-Derived Neural Networks.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Microfluidic Manipulation for Biomedical Applications in the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Microfluidics for Neuronal Cell and Circuit Engineering.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Regulatory Effects of Gradient Microtopographies on Synapse Formation and Neurite Growth in Hippocampal Neurons.Journal of micromechanics and microengineering : structures, devices, and systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Advances in ex vivo models and lab-on-a-chip devices for neural tissue engineering.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- A microfluidic platform to study the effects of GDNF on neuronal axon entrapment.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2018Article
- Tissue Strain Reorganizes Collagen With a Switchlike Response That Regulates Neuronal Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Phosphorylation In Vitro: Implications for Ligamentous Injury and Mechanotransduction.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2016Article
- Enhanced Immune Response in Immunodeficient Mice Improves Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Following Axotomy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016Article
- Growth factor choice is critical for successful functionalization of nanoparticles.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Article
- Microfluidic culture platform for studying neuronal response to mild to very mild axonal stretch injury.Biomicrofluidics · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traumatic injuries, both in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS), can potentially lead to irreversible damage resulting in permanent loss of function. Investigating the complex dynamics involved in these processes may elucidate the biological mechanisms of both nerve degeneration and regeneration, and may potentially lead to the development of new therapies for recovery. A scientific overview on the biological foundations of nerve injury is presented. Differences between nerve regeneration in the central and PNS are discussed. Advances in microtechnology over the past several years have led to the development of invaluable tools that now facilitate investigation of neurobiology at the cellular scale. Microfluidic devices are explored as a means to study nerve injury at the necessary simplification of the cellular level, including those devices aimed at both chemical and physical injury, as well as those that recreate the post-injury environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.