ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2015
Investigating biocomplexity through the agent-based paradigm.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- AutomataGPT: Transformer-Based Forecasting and Ruleset Inference for Two-Dimensional Cellular Automata.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- From genes to germ layers: virtual twins of gastruloids.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- Seven recommendations for scientists, universities, and funders to embrace interdisciplinarity : Practical guidelines to enabling interdisciplinarity.EMBO reports · 2024Article
- Towards early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: advances in immune-related blood biomarkers and computational approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Virtual cells in a virtual microenvironment recapitulate early development-like patterns in human pluripotent stem cell colonies.Stem cell reports · 2023Article
- Differentially targeted seeding reveals unique pathological alpha-synuclein propagation patterns.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Organoids by design.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- A system dynamics modelling simulation based on a cohort of hepatitis B epidemic research in east China community.Epidemiology and infection · 2019Article
- Programming Morphogenesis through Systems and Synthetic Biology.Trends in biotechnology · 2018Review
- BacArena: Individual-based metabolic modeling of heterogeneous microbes in complex communities.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- A Computational Model of Cellular Engraftment on Lung Scaffolds.BioResearch open access · 2016Article
- Synergistic activity of polarised osteoblasts inside condensations cause their differentiation.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- On the genealogy of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2015Review
- Agent-based spatiotemporal simulation of biomolecular systems within the open source MASON framework.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Potential new therapeutic modality revealed through agent-based modeling of the neuromuscular junction and acetylcholinesterase inhibition.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing the dynamism that pervades biological systems requires a computational approach that can accommodate both the continuous features of the system environment as well as the flexible and heterogeneous nature of component interactions. This presents a serious challenge for the more traditional mathematical approaches that assume component homogeneity to relate system observables using mathematical equations. While the homogeneity condition does not lead to loss of accuracy while simulating various continua, it fails to offer detailed solutions when applied to systems with dynamically interacting heterogeneous components. As the functionality and architecture of most biological systems is a product of multi-faceted individual interactions at the sub-system level, continuum models rarely offer much beyond qualitative similarity. Agent-based modelling is a class of algorithmic computational approaches that rely on interactions between Turing-complete finite-state machines--or agents--to simulate, from the bottom-up, macroscopic properties of a system. In recognizing the heterogeneity condition, they offer suitable ontologies to the system components being modelled, thereby succeeding where their continuum counterparts tend to struggle. Furthermore, being inherently hierarchical, they are quite amenable to coupling with other computational paradigms. The integration of any agent-based framework with continuum models is arguably the most elegant and precise way of representing biological systems. Although in its nascence, agent-based modelling has been utilized to model biological complexity across a broad range of biological scales (from cells to societies). In this article, we explore the reasons that make agent-based modelling the most precise approach to model biological systems that tend to be non-linear and complex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.