Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24226686›Full record

ArticlePlanta1988

Blue light promotes ionic current influx at the growing apex ofVaucheria terrestris.

H Kataoka, M H Weisenseel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 1988. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

H KataokaInstitute for Agricultural Research, Tohoku University, 980, Sendai, Japan.
M H Weisenseel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irradiation of the growing apex of the algaVaucheria terrestris Götz var.terrestris with blue light (BL), which causes a transient acceleration of growth, also causes a large transient increase in inwardly directed current, which was monitored with a vibrating probe. The growing apex is normally the site of an inward current, and the surface of the non-growing, basal part of the coenocytic cell the site of an outward current. Irradiation of the apex causes only a slight increase in current efflux at the basal part of the cell. The BL-promoted current influx at the apex (BLCI) usually starts within 10 s after the onset of irradiation, preceding the light-growth response. With BL pulses shorter than 3 min, the BLCI reaches a maximum in about 3 min, and then declines to its original value over the next 3 min. If the BL pulse is longer than 3 min, the BLCI continues until the light is turned off. The threshold energy of the BLCI with broad-band BL is 2-5 J·m(-2), i.e. smaller than for both the light-growth response and phototropic response. The maximum BLCI reaches a value of approx. 5 μA·cm(-2), equivalent to an influx of 50 pmol·cm(-2)·s(-1) of monovalent cations. The effect of red light (RL) is completely different from that of BL: it either causes increases in the inward current of less than 0.3 μA·cm(-2), or a transient decrease of current. Furthermore, the direction of the RL-induced change is always the same at the apex and trunk, indicating the participation of photosynthesis. Our results indicate that the BLCI is kinetically and spatially related to the light-growth response and the phototropic bending ofVaucheria. It seems to be a necessary step for the phototropic bending.

Identifiers

PMID24226686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.