Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24225486›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013

Current issues in medically assisted reproduction and genetics in Europe: research, clinical practice, ethics, legal issues and policy. European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

Joyce C Harper, Joep Geraedts, Pascal Borry, Martina C Cornel, Wybo Dondorp, Luca Gianaroli, Gary Harton, Tanya Milachich, Helena Kääriäinen, Inge Liebaers and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genetics in human reproduction.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The risk of birth defects after assisted reproduction.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Joyce C HarperUCL Centre for PG&D, Institute for Womens Health, University College London, London, UK.
Joep Geraedts
Pascal Borry
Martina C Cornel
Wybo Dondorp
Luca Gianaroli
Gary Harton
Tanya Milachich
Helena Kääriäinen
Inge Liebaers
Michael Morris
Jorge Sequeiros
Karen Sermon
Françoise Shenfield
Heather Skirton
Sirpa Soini
Claudia Spits
Anna Veiga
Joris Robert Vermeesch
Stéphane Viville
Guido de Wert
Milan Macek
ESHG
ESHRE
EuroGentest2

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In March 2005, a group of experts from the European Society of Human Genetics and European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology met to discuss the interface between genetics and assisted reproductive technology (ART), and published an extended background paper, recommendations and two Editorials. Seven years later, in March 2012, a follow-up interdisciplinary workshop was held, involving representatives of both professional societies, including experts from the European Union Eurogentest2 Coordination Action Project. The main goal of this meeting was to discuss developments at the interface between clinical genetics and ARTs. As more genetic causes of reproductive failure are now recognised and an increasing number of patients undergo testing of their genome before conception, either in regular health care or in the context of direct-to-consumer testing, the need for genetic counselling and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may increase. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) thus far does not have evidence from randomised clinical trials to substantiate that the technique is both effective and efficient. Whole-genome sequencing may create greater challenges both in the technological and interpretational domains, and requires further reflection about the ethics of genetic testing in ART and PGD/PGS. Diagnostic laboratories should be reporting their results according to internationally accepted accreditation standards (International Standards Organisation - ISO 15189). Further studies are needed in order to address issues related to the impact of ART on epigenetic reprogramming of the early embryo. The legal landscape regarding assisted reproduction is evolving but still remains very heterogeneous and often contradictory. The lack of legal harmonisation and uneven access to infertility treatment and PGD/PGS fosters considerable cross-border reproductive care in Europe and beyond. The aim of this paper is to complement previous publications and provide an update of selected topics that have evolved since 2005.

Indexed as

Reproductive Techniques, AssistedAnimalsCongenital AbnormalitiesDisease Models, AnimalEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenesis, GeneticEuropeFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic CounselingGenetics, MedicalGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGuidelines as TopicHumansInfertility

Identifiers

PMID24225486
PMCPMC3831061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.