Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24225255›Full record

ArticleAppetite2014

A preference test for sweet taste that uses edible strips.

Gregory Smutzer, Janki Y Patel, Judith C Stull, Ray A Abarintos, Neiladri K Khan, Kevin C Park

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Appetite, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory SmutzerDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States. Electronic address: smutzerg@temple.edu.
Janki Y PatelDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Judith C StullDepartment of Sociology, La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA 19141, United States.
Ray A AbarintosDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Neiladri K KhanDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States.
Kevin C ParkDepartment of Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, United States; Biocoat Incorporated, 211 Witmer Road, Horsham, PA 19044, United States.
Temple University · USLa Salle University · US

Funding

Cellulose-Based Strips for Human Taste EvaluationR44DC007291 · NIDCD · OSMIC ENTERPRISES, INC. · PI HASTINGS, LLOYD · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS 2R44 DC007291NIDCD NIH HHS R44 DC007291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel delivery method is described for the rapid determination of taste preferences for sweet taste in humans. This forced-choice paired comparison approach incorporates the non-caloric sweetener sucralose into a set of one-inch square edible strips for the rapid determination of sweet taste preferences. When compared to aqueous sucrose solutions, significantly lower amounts of sucralose were required to identify the preference for sweet taste. The validity of this approach was determined by comparing sweet taste preferences obtained with five different sucralose-containing edible strips to a set of five intensity-matched sucrose solutions. When compared to the solution test, edible strips required approximately the same number of steps to identify the preferred amount of sweet taste stimulus. Both approaches yielded similar distribution patterns for the preferred amount of sweet taste stimulus. In addition, taste intensity values for the preferred amount of sucralose in strips were similar to that of sucrose in solution. The hedonic values for the preferred amount of sucralose were lower than for sucrose, but the taste quality of the preferred sucralose strip was described as sweet. When taste intensity values between sucralose strips and sucralose solutions containing identical amounts of taste stimulus were compared, sucralose strips produced a greater taste intensity and more positive hedonic response. A preference test that uses edible strips for stimulus delivery should be useful for identifying preferences for sweet taste in young children, and in clinical populations. This test should also be useful for identifying sweet taste preferences outside of the lab or clinic. Finally, edible strips should be useful for developing preference tests for other primary taste stimuli and for taste mixtures.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDietary SucroseFood PreferencesSweetening AgentsTasteAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleSucroseDietary SucroseSucroseSweetening AgentstrichlorosucroseEdible taste stripGustationSucraloseSweet tasteTaste preferenceTaste test

Identifiers

PMID24225255
PMCPMC3956596
OpenAlexW2095349359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.