Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24225146›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2013

Knowledge translation in Iranian universities: need for serious interventions.

Jaleh Gholami, Sharareh Ahghari, Abbas Motevalian, Vahid Yousefinejad, Ghobad Moradi, Abbasali Keshtkar, Ali Alami, Saeideh Mazloomzadeh, Mohammad Masoud Vakili, Reza Chaman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jaleh Gholami
Sharareh Ahghari
Abbas Motevalian
Vahid Yousefinejad
Ghobad Moradi
Abbasali Keshtkar
Ali Alami
Saeideh Mazloomzadeh
Mohammad Masoud Vakili
Reza Chaman
Bahman Salehi
Omid Fazelzadeh
Reza MajdzadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. rezamajdzadeh@tums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the status of knowledge translation (KT) in Iranian medical science universities in order to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the most important organizations responsible for producing knowledge in the country.

methodsThe KT activities were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively in nine universities using the Self-Assessment Tool for Research Institutes.

resultsThe strengths and weaknesses of universities were determined using seven main themes: priority setting; research quality and timeliness; researchers' KT capacities; interaction with research users; the facilities and prerequisites of KT; the processes and regulations supporting KT; and promoting and evaluating the use of evidence.The quantitative and qualitative results showed that the Iranian universities did not have an appropriate context for KT. There were significant shortcomings in supportive regulations, facilities for KT activities, and the level of interaction between the researchers and research users.

conclusionsThe shortcomings in KT were mostly in the area of stewardship and policymaking (macro level), followed by planning and implementation at the universities. In order to strengthen KT in Iran, it should occupy a prominent and focused role in the strategies of the country's health research system.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth Services Needs and DemandPolicy MakingTranslational Research, BiomedicalUniversitiesHumansIran

Identifiers

PMID24225146
PMCPMC3835863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.