Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24223917›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Microbial environment affects innate immunity in two closely related earthworm species Eisenia andrei and Eisenia fetida.

Jiří Dvořák, Veronika Mančíková, Václav Pižl, Dana Elhottová, Marcela Silerová, Radka Roubalová, František Skanta, Petra Procházková, Martin Bilej

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Mutual interactions of E. andrei earthworm and pathogens during the process of vermicomposting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contribution of Eisenia andrei earthworms in pathogen reduction during vermicomposting.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jiří DvořákLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v. v. i., Prague, Czech Republic.
Veronika Mančíková
Václav Pižl
Dana Elhottová
Marcela Silerová
Radka Roubalová
František Skanta
Petra Procházková
Martin Bilej

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival of earthworms in the environment depends on their ability to recognize and eliminate potential pathogens. This work is aimed to compare the innate defense mechanisms of two closely related earthworm species, Eisenia andrei and Eisenia fetida, that inhabit substantially different ecological niches. While E. andrei lives in a compost and manure, E. fetida can be found in the litter layer in forests. Therefore, the influence of environment-specific microbiota on the immune response of both species was followed. Firstly, a reliable method to discern between E. andrei and E. fetida based on species-specific primers for cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) and stringent PCR conditions was developed. Secondly, to analyze the immunological profile in both earthworm species, the activity and expression of lysozyme, pattern recognition protein CCF, and antimicrobial proteins with hemolytic function, fetidin and lysenins, have been assessed. Whereas, CCF and lysozyme showed only slight differences in the expression and activity, fetidin/lysenins expression as well as the hemolytic activity was considerably higher in E. andrei as compared to E. fetida. The expression of fetidin/lysenins in E. fetida was not affected upon the challenge with compost microbiota, suggesting more substantial changes in the regulation of the gene expression. Genomic DNA analyses revealed significantly higher level of fetidin/lysenins (determined using universal primer pairs) in E. andrei compared to E. fetida. It can be hypothesized that E. andrei colonizing compost as a new habitat acquired an evolutionary selection advantage resulting in a higher expression of antimicrobial proteins.

Indexed as

EcosystemAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceCell Line, TumorCytotoxicity, ImmunologicElectron Transport Complex IVGene ExpressionHemolysisImmunity, InnateManureMiceMolecular Sequence DataMuramidaseOligochaetaProteinsElectron Transport Complex IVfetidinlyseninManureMuramidaseProteinsToxins, Biological

Identifiers

PMID24223917
PMCPMC3815151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.