ArticlePloS one2013
Making research data repositories visible: the re3data.org Registry.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of simulator sickness as a function of simulator fidelity.Experimental brain research · 2022Pooled it
- GigaDB: a redesigned repository for data publishing and management.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies.Cell genomics · 2025Review
- The China National GeneBank Sequence Archive (CNSA) 2024 update.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Reusability-targeted enrichment of sea ice core data.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Affording reusable data: recommendations for researchers from a data-intensive project.Scientific data · 2025Article
- AgBioDatabase Finder: an online tool to help researchers find and submit agricultural genomic, genetic, and breeding data.microPublication biology · 2025Article
- High-resolution accurate mass- mass spectrometry based- untargeted metabolomics: Reproducibility and detection power across data-dependent acquisition, data-independent acquisition, and AcquireX.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Early mutational signatures and transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma and Lambda variants in Chile.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Making Mathematical Research Data FAIR: Pathways to Improved Data Sharing.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Making Mathematical Research Data FAIR: Pathways to Improved Data Sharing.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Seek and you may (not) find: A multi-institutional analysis of where research data are shared.PloS one · 2024Article
- Chronic disease outcome metadata from German observational studies - public availability and FAIR principles.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- EpiMix: A novel method to estimate effective reproduction number.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2023Article
- re3data - Indexing the Global Research Data Repository Landscape Since 2012.Scientific data · 2023Article
- A proposed FAIR approach for disseminating geospatial information system maps.Scientific data · 2023Article
- Overview of ICARUS-A Curated, Open Access, Online Repository for Atmospheric Simulation Chamber Data.ACS earth & space chemistry · 2023Article
- A machine learning-enabled open biodata resource inventory from the scientific literature.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Researchers require infrastructures that ensure a maximum of accessibility, stability and reliability to facilitate working with and sharing of research data. Such infrastructures are being increasingly summarized under the term Research Data Repositories (RDR). The project re3data.org-Registry of Research Data Repositories-has begun to index research data repositories in 2012 and offers researchers, funding organizations, libraries and publishers an overview of the heterogeneous research data repository landscape. In July 2013 re3data.org lists 400 research data repositories and counting. 288 of these are described in detail using the re3data.org vocabulary. Information icons help researchers to easily identify an adequate repository for the storage and reuse of their data. This article describes the heterogeneous RDR landscape and presents a typology of institutional, disciplinary, multidisciplinary and project-specific RDR. Further the article outlines the features of re3data.org, and shows how this registry helps to identify appropriate repositories for storage and search of research data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.