Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24223516›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2013

Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate.

Timothy Caulfield, Jim Evans, Amy McGuire, Christopher McCabe, Tania Bubela, Robert Cook-Deegan, Jennifer Fishman, Stuart Hogarth, Fiona A Miller, Vardit Ravitsky and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Short-term costs of integrating whole-genome sequencing into primary care and cardiology settings: a pilot randomized trial.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018
    Trial
  2. Whole exome sequencing in molecular diagnostics of cancer decreases over time: evidence from a cost analysis in the French setting.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Genome Diagnostics: Novel Strategies for Measuring Value.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cost Analyses of Genomic Sequencing: Lessons Learned from the MedSeq Project.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A microcosting and cost-consequence analysis of clinical genomic testing strategies in autism spectrum disorder.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Finding the right balance between precision medicine and personalized care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Timothy CaulfieldHealth Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jim Evans
Amy McGuire
Christopher McCabe
Tania Bubela
Robert Cook-Deegan
Jennifer Fishman
Stuart Hogarth
Fiona A Miller
Vardit Ravitsky
Barbara Biesecker
Pascal Borry
Mildred K Cho
June C Carroll
Holly Etchegary
Yann Joly
Kazuto Kato
Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
Karen Rothenberg
Pamela Sankar
Michael J Szego
Pilar Ossorio
Daryl Pullman
Francois Rousseau
Wendy J Ungar
Brenda Wilson

Funding

The Management and Organization Core will be administered by the Center for GenomP50HG003391 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BESKOW, LAURA M. · 2004 to 2014
$9.9M
CIHRIntramural NIH HHSNHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cost of whole genome sequencing is dropping rapidly. There has been a great deal of enthusiasm about the potential for this technological advance to transform clinical care. Given the interest and significant investment in genomics, this seems an ideal time to consider what the evidence tells us about potential benefits and harms, particularly in the context of health care policy. The scale and pace of adoption of this powerful new technology should be driven by clinical need, clinical evidence, and a commitment to put patients at the centre of health care policy.

Indexed as

Health PolicyGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPublic OpinionSequence Analysis, DNAUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24223516
PMCPMC3818164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.