Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24222963›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Quantification of pancreatic exocrine function of chronic pancreatitis with secretin-enhanced MRCP.

Yun Bian, Li Wang, Chao Chen, Jian-Ping Lu, Jia-Bao Fan, Shi-Yue Chen, Bing-Hui Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Secretin-Enhanced MRCP: How and Why-AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021
    Review
  9. Turkish Gastroenterology Association, Pancreas Study Group, Chronic Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  10. Quantitative pancreatic MRI: a pathology-based review.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review.The Indian journal of surgery · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatitis: an update.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  17. Imaging in chronic pancreatitis: State of the art review.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yun BianYun Bian, Li Wang, Chao Chen, Jian-Ping Lu, Jia-Bao Fan, Shi-Yue Chen, Bing-Hui Zhao, Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Li Wang
Chao Chen
Jian-Ping Lu
Jia-Bao Fan
Shi-Yue Chen
Bing-Hui Zhao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo obtain reference values for pancreatic flow output rate (PFR) and peak time (PT) in healthy volunteers and chronic pancreatitis (CP); to correlate quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (SMRCP) of pancreatic fluid output following secretin with fecal elastase-1 (FE-1) tests.

methodsThe present study includes 53 subjects comprised of 17 healthy individuals and 36 patients with CP from April 2011 to January 2013. The 36 patients with CP were divided into three groups of mild CP (n = 14), moderate CP (n = 19) and advanced CP (n = 3) by M-ANNHEIM classification for CP.. Fifty-three cases underwent FE-1 test and magnetic resonance imaging using 3.0 T-device (Signa EXCITE, GE Healthcare). Coronal T2-weighted single-shot turbo spin-echo, spiratory triggered, covering the papillae, duodenum and small bowel. MRCP was performed with a heavily T2-weighted fat-suppressed long TE HASTE sequence (thick slab 2D MRCP sequence), repeated every 2 min up to 11 min after 0.1 mL/kg secretin injection (Secrelux, Sanochemia(®), Germany). FE-1 test used sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test (ScheBo. Tech(®), Germany).

resultsA good linear correlation showed between the calculated volume and the actual volume by Phantom experiments. Fifty-three paired Quantification of secretin enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCPQ) and FE-1 data sets were analyzed. The mean FE-1 of 53 cases was 525.41 ± 94.44 μg/g for 17 healthy volunteers, 464.95 ± 136.13 μg/g for mild CP, 301.55 ± 181.55 μg/g for moderate CP, 229.30 ± 146.60 μg/g for advanced CP. Also, there was statistically significant difference in FE-1 (P = 0.0001) between health and CP. The mean values of PFR and PT were 8.18 ± 1.11 mL/min, 5.76 ± 1.71 min for normal; 7.27 ± 2.04 mL/min, 7.71 ± 2.55 min for mild CP; 4.98 ± 2.57 mL/min, 9.10 ± 3.00 min for moderate CP; 4.13 ± 1.83 mL/min, 12.33 ± 1.55 min for advanced CP. Further, statistically significant difference in PFR (P = 0.0001) and PT (P = 0.0001) was observed between health and CP. Besides, there was correlation (r = 0.79) and consistency (K = 0.6) between MRCPQ and ELISA Test. It was related between M-ANNHEIM classification and PFR (r = 0.55), FE-1 (r = 0.57).

conclusionSMRCP can provide a safe, non-invasive and efficient method to evaluate the exocrine function of the pancreas.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonancePancreatic Function TestsSecretinAdultAnalysis of VarianceBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesClinical Enzyme TestsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPancreas, ExocrineBiomarkersPancreatic ElastaseSecretinChronic pancreatitisMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatographyMagnetic resonance imagingPancreatic exocrine functionSecretin

Identifiers

PMID24222963
PMCPMC3819555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.