Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24222954›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Photodynamic therapy vs radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's dysplasia: efficacy, safety and cost-comparison.

Atilla Ertan, Irum Zaheer, Arlene M Correa, Nirav Thosani, Shanda H Blackmon

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic management of esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019
    Review
  10. Endoscopic therapy for confirmed low-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018
    Review
  11. Radiofrequency ablation devices.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Barrett's esophagus: diagnosis and management.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Esophageal papilloma: Flexible endoscopic ablation by radiofrequency.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atilla ErtanAtilla Ertan, Nirav Thosani, Ertan Digestive Disease Center, Memorial Hermann Hospital, Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Irum Zaheer
Arlene M Correa
Nirav Thosani
Shanda H Blackmon
Memorial Hermann · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare effectiveness, safety, and cost of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treatment of Barrett's dysplasia (BD).

methodsConsecutive case series of patients undergoing either PDT or RFA treatment at single center by a single investigator were compared. Thirty-three patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) had treatment with porfimer sodium photosensitzer and 630 nm laser (130 J/cm), with maximum of 3 treatment sessions. Fifty-three patients with BD (47 with low-grade dysplasia -LGD, 6 with HGD) had step-wise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system with maximum of 4 treatment sessions. Both groups received proton pump inhibitors twice daily. Endoscopic biopsies were acquired at 2 and 12 mo after enrollment, with 4-quadrant biopsies every 1 cm of the original BE extent. A complete histological resolution response of BD (CR-D) was defined as all biopsies at the last endoscopy session negative for BD. Fisher's exact test was used to assess differences between the two study groups for primary outcomes. For all outcomes, a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

resultsThirty (91%) PDT patients and 39 (74%) RFA were men (P = 0.05). The mean age was 70.7 ± 12.2 and 65.4 ± 12.7 (P = 0.10) year and mean length of BE was 5.4 ± 3.2 cm and 5.7 ± 3.2 cm (P = 0.53) for PDT and RFA patients, respectively. The CR-D was (18/33) 54.5% with PDT vs (47/53) 88.7% with RFA (P = 0.001). One patient with PDT had an esophageal perforation and was managed with non-surgical measures and no perforation was seen with RFA. PDT was five times more costly than RFA at our institution. The two groups were not randomized and had different BD grading are the limitations of the study.

conclusionIn our experience, RFA had higher rate of CR-D without any serious adverse events and was less costly than PDT for endoscopic treatment of BD.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationHealth Care CostsPhotochemotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overBarrett EsophagusBiopsyCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsDihematoporphyrin EtherDrug Administration ScheduleDrug CostsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDihematoporphyrin EtherPhotosensitizing AgentsProton Pump InhibitorsBarrett’s esophagusCost comparisonDysplasiaPhotodynamic therapyRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID24222954
PMCPMC3819546
OpenAlexW2096464152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.