ArticleBioMed research international2013
Sensitivity of rabbit ventricular action potential and Ca²⁺ dynamics to small variations in membrane currents and ion diffusion coefficients.
Article in BioMed research international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcium-mediated DAD in membrane potentials and triggered activity in atrial myocytes of ETV1Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024Article
- Calcium-Mediated Oscillation in Membrane Potentials and Atrial-Triggered Activity in Atrial Cells of Casq2Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Little is known about how small variations in ionic currents and Ca²⁺ and Na⁺ diffusion coefficients impact action potential and Ca²⁺ dynamics in rabbit ventricular myocytes. We applied sensitivity analysis to quantify the sensitivity of Shannon et al. model (Biophys. J., 2004) to 5%-10% changes in currents conductance, channels distribution, and ion diffusion in rabbit ventricular cells. We found that action potential duration and Ca²⁺ peaks are highly sensitive to 10% increase in L-type Ca²⁺ current; moderately influenced by 10% increase in Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchanger, Na⁺-K⁺ pump, rapid delayed and slow transient outward K⁺ currents, and Cl⁻ background current; insensitive to 10% increases in all other ionic currents and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺ fluxes. Cell electrical activity is strongly affected by 5% shift of L-type Ca²⁺ channels and Na⁺-Ca²⁺ exchanger in between junctional and submembrane spaces while Ca²⁺-activated Cl⁻-channel redistribution has the modest effect. Small changes in submembrane and cytosolic diffusion coefficients for Ca²⁺, but not in Na⁺ transfer, may alter notably myocyte contraction. Our studies highlight the need for more precise measurements and further extending and testing of the Shannon et al. model. Our results demonstrate usefulness of sensitivity analysis to identify specific knowledge gaps and controversies related to ventricular cell electrophysiology and Ca²⁺ signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.