Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24221911›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2014

Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) gene polymorphisms and recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis.

Jie Li, Yang Chen, Hongbo Wu, Liuming Li

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The lncRNAJournal of inflammation research · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Maternal apolipoprotein E genotype as a potential risk factor for poor birth outcomes: The Bogalusa Heart Study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie LiGuangxi Reproductive Medical Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, 530021, China.
Yang Chen
Hongbo Wu
Liuming Li
First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, a relationship between recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and Apolipoprotein E (Apo E) gene polymorphisms has been proposed. In order to investigate the real association between Apo E polymorphisms and RPL, our meta-analysis was carried out.

methodsWe estimated the association with RPL risk under dominant and recessive models, in combination with the OR and RR with a 95% confidence interval (CI), which was used to assess the association between RPL and Apo E polymorphisms.

resultsAccording to our criterion, there were 6 studies included. The dominant model used the E4/E3 group and the OR was 1.919 (95 %CI: 1.016-3.625, I(2) = 53.8%), the RR was 1.308 (95%Cl: 1.071-1.598) suggesting that carriers of the E4 allele would have a higher risk of causing spontaneous miscarriages. In addition, the OR was 0.727 (95%CI: 0.566-0.932, I(2) = 0.0%) and RR was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.867-0.982) in a fixed model for E3/E3 homozygotes versus other genotypes, suggesting that the Apo E3 polymorphism could be a protective factor. The OR was 1.365 (95% CI: 1.029-1.811, I(2) = 0 .0%) in a fixed model comparing the E2 allele with the E3 allele, suggesting that Apo E2 polymorphisms may contribute to RPL as a risk factor. Furthermore, after conducting sensitivity analysis in the E4/E3 group, the results showed this to be consistent and the OR was 2.249 (95%CI: 1.474-3.431).

conclusionsThere is a close association between RPL and Apo E gene polymorphisms. For RPL, the Apo E4 polymorphism could be a risk factor, the Apo E3 polymorphism may be a protective factor and the Apo E2 polymorphism may be another potential risk factor.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticAbortion, HabitualApolipoproteins EFemaleHomozygoteHumansModels, GeneticPregnancyApolipoproteins E

Identifiers

PMID24221911
PMCPMC3933605
OpenAlexW2082276431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.