Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24221493›Full record

ArticlePlant cell reports1991

Relationship between protoplast size and critical field strength in protoplast electropulsing and application to reliable DNA uptake in Brassica.

D Rouan, M H Montané, G Alibert, J Teissié

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant cell reports, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D RouanLaboratoire de Biotechnologie et Amélioration des Plantes, INP-ENSAT, 145 Av. de Muret, F-31076, Toulouse, France.
M H Montané
G Alibert
J Teissié

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protoplast diameter, a physical parameter controlling the susceptibility to electropermeation, was observed to vary between different batches of Brassica napus and Brassica campestris protoplasts. In order to control the permeation field strength associated with the protoplast size, we investigated the mathematical relationship between permeant field strength and protoplast size by measuring electroloading of the calcein dye under conditions that did not alter protoplast survival. A roughly linear relationship was obtained when the permeant field strength was plotted against the reciprocal of the radius. The plot characteristics were found to be tissue specific (mesophyll, hypocotyl and cotyledon), species specific (turnip, rapeseed) and modulated by the pulse duration. These plots were used as reference curves to determine accurate electrical conditions for DNA transfer whatever the size distributions of different protoplast batches.

Identifiers

PMID24221493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.