Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24219600›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2013

The biodistribution of self-assembling protein nanoparticles shows they are promising vaccine platforms.

Yongkun Yang, Tobias Neef, Christian Mittelholzer, Elisa Garcia Garayoa, Peter Bläuenstein, Roger Schibli, Ueli Aebi, Peter Burkhard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Design and Evaluation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Optimizing the design of protein nanoparticles as carriers for vaccine applications.Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine · 2015
    Article
  7. Functional nanomaterials can optimize the efficacy of vaccines.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2014
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongkun Yang
Tobias Neef
Christian Mittelholzer
Elisa Garcia Garayoa
Peter Bläuenstein
Roger Schibli
Ueli Aebi
Peter BurkhardDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology and Institute of Materials Science, University of Connecticut, 97 N, Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06250, USA. peter.burkhard@uconn.edu.
Paul Scherrer Institute · CHUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of the need to limit side-effects, nanoparticles are increasingly being studied as drug-carrying and targeting tools. We have previously reported on a scheme to produce protein-based self-assembling nanoparticles that can act as antigen display platforms. Here we attempted to use the same system for cancer-targeting, making use of a C-terminal bombesin peptide that has high affinity for a receptor known to be overexpressed in certain tumors, as well as an N-terminal polyhistidine tag that can be used for radiolabeling with technetium tricarbonyl.

resultsIn order to increase circulation time, we experimented with PEGylated and unPEGylated varities typo particle. We also tested the effect of incorporating different numbers of bombesins per nanoparticle. Biophysical characterization determined that all configurations assemble into regular particles with relatively monodisperse size distributions, having peaks of about 33-36 nm. The carbonyl method used for labeling produced approximately 80% labeled nanoparticles. In vitro, the nanoparticles showed high binding, both specific and non-specific, to PC-3 prostate cancer cells. In vivo, high uptake was observed for all nanoparticle types in the spleens of CD-1 nu/nu mice, decreasing significantly over the course of 24 hours. High uptake was also observed in the liver, while only low uptake was seen in both the pancreas and a tumor xenograft.

conclusionsThe data suggest that the nanoparticles are non-specifically taken up by the reticuloendothelial system. Low uptake in the pancreas and tumor indicate that there is little or no specific targeting. PEGylation or increasing the amount of bombesins per nanoparticle did not significantly improve targeting. In particular, the uptake in the spleen, which is a primary organ of the immune system, highlights the potential of the nanoparticles as vaccine carriers. Also, the decrease in liver and spleen radioactivity with time implies that the nanoparticles are broken down and cleared. This is an important finding, as it shows that the nanoparticles can be safely used as a vaccine platform without the risk of prolonged side effects. Furthermore, it demonstrates that technetium carbonyl radiolabeling of our protein-based nanoparticles can be used to evaluate their pharmacokinetic properties in vivo.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBombesinCancer VaccinesDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansLiverMaleMiceMolecular Sequence DataNanoparticlesParticle SizePeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsBombesinCancer VaccinesPeptidesPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTechnetium

Identifiers

PMID24219600
PMCPMC3832906
OpenAlexW2111172898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.