Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24219304›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2014

Progress in a replicated selection for elevated blood ethanol concentrations in HDID mice.

J C Crabbe, P Metten, J K Belknap, S E Spence, A J Cameron, J P Schlumbohm, L C Huang, A M Barkley-Levenson, M M Ford, T J Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

J C CrabbePortland Alcohol Research Center; Veterans Affairs Medical Center; Department of Behavioral Neuroscience.
P Metten
J K Belknap
S E Spence
A J Cameron
J P Schlumbohm
L C Huang
A M Barkley-Levenson
M M Ford
T J Phillips

Funding

Upgrade of confocal microscopy at the Oregon National Primate Research CenterP51OD011092 · OD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Bonnie J. Nagel · 2012 to 2026
$203.9M
Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
BIOLOGICAL BASES OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007468 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrey E Ryabinin · 1987 to 2026
$11.3M
Selective Breeding for Drinking in the Circadian DarkU01AA013519 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Angela Renee Ozburn · 2001 to 2026
$10.9M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
Mouse Genetic Models for Alcohol ResearchR24AA020245 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2011 to 2020
$2.3M
The role of neuropeptide Y in binge-like drinking in miceF31AA022009 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BARKLEY-LEVENSON, AMANDA MALINA · 2012 to 2015
$109k
Genetic Models of AlcoholismI01BX000313 · VA · PORTLAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 2009 to 2019
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000313BLRD VA IK6 BX006342NIAAA NIH HHS AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS AA013519NIAAA NIH HHS AA020245NIAAA NIH HHS AA022009NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA022009NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA020245NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007468NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013519NIH HHS OD11092NIH HHS P51 OD011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drinking in the dark (DID) is a limited access ethanol-drinking phenotype in mice. High Drinking in the Dark (HDID-1) mice have been bred for 27 selected generations (S27) for elevated blood ethanol concentrations (BECs) after a 4-h period of access to 20% ethanol. A second replicate line (HDID-2) was started later from the same founder population and is currently in S20. An initial report of response to selection in HDID-1 was published after S11. This article reports genetic and behavioral characteristics of both lines in comparison with the HS controls. Heritability is low in both replicates (h(2)  = 0.09) but the lines have shown 4-5 fold increases in BEC since S0; 80% of HDID-1 and 60% of HDID-2 mice reach BECs greater than 1.0 mg/ml. Several hours after a DID test, HDID mice show mild signs of withdrawal. Although not considered during selection, intake of ethanol (g/kg) during the DID test increased by approximately 80% in HDID-1 and 60% in HDID-2. Common genetic influences were more important than environmental influences in determining the similarity between BEC and intake for HDID mice. Analysis of the partitioning of intake showed that 60% of intake is concentrated in the last 2 h of the 4 h session. However, this has not changed during selection. Hourly BECs during the DID test reach peak levels after 3 or 4 h of drinking. HDID mice do not differ from HS mice in their rate of elimination of an acute dose of alcohol.

Indexed as

InbreedingSelection, GeneticAnimalsBinge DrinkingEthanolFemaleMaleMiceEthanolBingeethanol consumptionethanol withdrawalgeneticsselective breeding

Identifiers

PMID24219304
PMCPMC3923418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.