Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218639›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2013

Enhancer turnover and conserved regulatory function in vertebrate evolution.

Sabina Domené, Viviana F Bumaschny, Flávio S J de Souza, Lucía F Franchini, Sofía Nasif, Malcolm J Low, Marcelo Rubinstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A mammalian tripartite enhancer cluster controls hypothalamicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The GRN concept as a guide for evolutionary developmental biology.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabina DomenéInstituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, , C1428ADN Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Viviana F Bumaschny
Flávio S J de Souza
Lucía F Franchini
Sofía Nasif
Malcolm J Low
Marcelo Rubinstein
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARExperimental Medicine and Biology Institute · ARUniversity of Buenos Aires · ARUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Regional Pilot And Feasibility Study Grants ProgramP30DK020572 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mehboob A Hussain · 2013 to 2026
$24.3M
Proopiomelanocortin Gene Expression and ObesityR01DK068400 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LOW, MALCOLM JAMES · 2004 to 2022
$6.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK068400NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020572NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in regulatory regions including enhancers are an important source of variation and innovation during evolution. Enhancers can evolve by changes in the sequence, arrangement and repertoire of transcription factor binding sites, but whole enhancers can also be lost or gained in certain lineages in a process of turnover. The proopiomelanocortin gene (Pomc), which encodes a prohormone, is expressed in the pituitary and hypothalamus of all jawed vertebrates. We have previously described that hypothalamic Pomc expression in mammals is controlled by two enhancers-nPE1 and nPE2-that are derived from transposable elements and that presumably replaced the ancestral neuronal Pomc regulatory regions. Here, we show that nPE1 and nPE2, even though they are mammalian novelties with no homologous counterpart in other vertebrates, nevertheless can drive gene expression specifically to POMC neurons in the hypothalamus of larval and adult transgenic zebrafish. This indicates that when neuronal Pomc enhancers originated de novo during early mammalian evolution, the newly created cis- and trans-codes were similar to the ancestral ones. We also identify the neuronal regulatory region of zebrafish pomca and confirm that it is not homologous to the mammalian enhancers. Our work sheds light on the process of gene regulatory evolution by showing how a locus can undergo enhancer turnover and nevertheless maintain the ancestral transcriptional output.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedComputational BiologyConserved SequenceEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression RegulationImmunohistochemistryIn Situ HybridizationMutationNeuronsPro-OpiomelanocortinVertebratesZebrafishZebrafish Proteinspomca protein, zebrafishPro-OpiomelanocortinZebrafish Proteinscomparative genomicshypothalamusmammalsproopiomelanocortinteleoststransgenic zebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24218639
PMCPMC3826500
OpenAlexW1971331435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.