Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218619›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Comprehensive analysis of imprinted genes in maize reveals allelic variation for imprinting and limited conservation with other species.

Amanda J Waters, Paul Bilinski, Steven R Eichten, Matthew W Vaughn, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra, Mary Gehring, Nathan M Springer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Parental dialectic: Epigenetic conversations in endosperm.Current opinion in plant biology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. High- or Low-Yielding FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transgenerational Paternal Inheritance ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda J WatersMicrobial and Plant Genomics Institute and Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108.
Paul Bilinski
Steven R Eichten
Matthew W Vaughn
Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Mary Gehring
Nathan M Springer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, a subset of genes exhibit imprinting in endosperm tissue such that expression is primarily from the maternal or paternal allele. Imprinting may arise as a consequence of mechanisms for silencing of transposons during reproduction, and in some cases imprinted expression of particular genes may provide a selective advantage such that it is conserved across species. Separate mechanisms for the origin of imprinted expression patterns and maintenance of these patterns may result in substantial variation in the targets of imprinting in different species. Here we present deep sequencing of RNAs isolated from reciprocal crosses of four diverse maize genotypes, providing a comprehensive analysis that allows evaluation of imprinting at more than 95% of endosperm-expressed genes. We find that over 500 genes exhibit statistically significant parent-of-origin effects in maize endosperm tissue, but focused our analyses on a subset of these genes that had >90% expression from the maternal allele (69 genes) or from the paternal allele (108 genes) in at least one reciprocal cross. Over 10% of imprinted genes show evidence of allelic variation for imprinting. A comparison of imprinting in maize and rice reveals that 13% of genes with syntenic orthologs in both species exhibit conserved imprinting. Genes that exhibit conserved imprinting between maize and rice have elevated nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution ratios compared with other imprinted genes, suggesting a history of more rapid evolution. Together, these data suggest that imprinting only has functional relevance at a subset of loci that currently exhibit imprinting in maize.

Indexed as

AllelesEvolution, MolecularGenetic VariationBase SequenceBayes TheoremCrosses, GeneticGenetics, PopulationGenomic ImprintingHybridization, GeneticMolecular Sequence AnnotationMolecular Sequence DataOryzaPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityZea mays

Identifiers

PMID24218619
PMCPMC3845156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.