ArticleAnnals of family medicine
Patients' experiences in different models of community health centers in southern China.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process Evaluation of a Clustered Randomized Control Trial of a Comprehensive Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Primary Health Care in Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Rural-to-Urban Migrants' Experiences with Primary Care under Different Types of Medical Institutions in Guangzhou, China.PloS one · 2015Trial
- Primary care quality of primary healthcare institutions in china: current status and influencing factors.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Trajectories of Treatment Burden Among Primary Care Patients with Long-Term Conditions in Southern China: A Latent Class Growth Analysis.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- Barriers to community healthcare delivery in urban China: a nurse perspective.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Assessing Spatial Accessibility of Community Hospitals for the Elderly in Beijing, China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Evaluation and countermeasures of contracted services of Chinese family doctors from demanders' point of view - a case study of a city.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Determinants of choice of usual source of care among older people with cardiovascular diseases in China: evidence from the Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Primary Health Institutions and Service Quality in China: Implications for Health Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Healthcare needs, experiences and treatment burden in primary care patients with multimorbidity: An evaluation of process of care from patients' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Association between Systolic Blood Pressure and Diabetic Retinopathy in Both Hypertensive and Normotensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Risk Factors and Healthcare Implications.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Comparing the Quality of Primary Care between Public and Private Providers in Urban China: A Standardized Patient Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Effect of family doctor contract services on patient perceived quality of primary care in southern China.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- The quality of primary care in community health centers: comparison among urban, suburban and rural users in Shanghai, China.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Comparison of Primary Care Experience in Hospital-Based Practices and Community-Based Office Practices in Japan.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Development of primary care assessment tool-adult version in Tibet: implication for low- and middle-income countries.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Evaluating Primary Health Care Performance from User Perspective in China: Review of Survey Instruments and Implementation Issues.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Review
- Effect of family practice contract services on the quality of primary care in Guangzhou, China: a cross-sectional study using PCAT-AE.BMJ open · 2018Article
- The Impact of Community-Based Supports and Services on Quality of Life Among the Elderly in China: A Longitudinal Study.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent health care reforms in China have an overall goal of strengthening primary care through the establishment and expansion of primary care networks based on community health centers (CHCs). Implementation in urban areas has led to the emergence of different models of ownership and management. The objective of this study was to evaluate the primary care experiences of patients in the Pearl River Delta as measured by the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) and the relationships with ownership and management in the 3 different models we describe.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted on-site at CHCs in 3 cities within the Pearl River Delta, China, using a multistage cluster sampling method. A validated Mandarin Chinese version of the PCAT-Adult Edition (short version) was adopted to collect information from adult patients regarding their experiences with primary care sources. PCAT scores for individual primary care attributes and total primary care assessment scores were assessed with respect to sociodemographic characteristics, health characteristics, and health care service utilization across 3 primary care models.
resultsOne thousand four hundred forty (1,440) primary care patients responded to the survey, for an overall response rate of 86.1%. Respondents gave government-owned and -managed CHCs the highest overall PCAT scores when compared with CHCs either managed by hospitals (95.18 vs 90.81; P = .005) or owned by private and social entities (95.18 vs 90.69; P =.007) as a result of better first-contact care (better first-contact utilization) and coordination of care (better service coordination and information system). Factors that were positively and significantly associated with higher overall assessment scores included the presence of a chronic condition (P <.001), having medical insurance (P = .006), and a self-reported good health status (P <.001).
conclusionsThis study suggests that government-owned and -managed CHCs may be able to provide better first-contact care in terms of utilization and coordination of care, and may be better at solving the problem of underutilization of the CHCs as the first-contact point of care, one key problem facing the reforms in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.