Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218336›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014

Prognostic value of circulating tumor cells in patients with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis.

Lu Han, Wei Chen, Qicheng Zhao

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04048278 (Lidocaine Infusion in Pancreatic Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04048278 early_phase1recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Lidocaine Infusion in Pancreatic Cancer: Translational Studies in a Preclinical Model And Human Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2018 to 2028Enrolled46ConditionsPancreatic CancerArmsLidocaine Hydrochloride, Saline Solution for Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Advances in Liquid Biopsy Technology and Implications for Pancreatic Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Exploring the Clinical Utility of Pancreatic Cancer Circulating Tumor Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu HanEconomics Division, School of Social and International Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Wei Chen
Qicheng Zhao
Tongji University · CNUniversity of Bradford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing scientific evidences suggest that circulating tumor cells (CTC) in peripheral blood may be a powerful predictor of survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, many existing studies have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis aims to assess the prognostic value of CTC in patients with pancreatic cancer. An extensive literary search for relevant studies was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CISCOM, CINAHL, Google Scholar, CNKI, and CBM databases from their inception through July 1, 2013. The meta-analysis was then performed using the Stata 12.0 software. Crude hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated under a fixed or random effect model. Nine cohort studies were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 623 pancreatic cancer patients. This number included 268 CTC-positive patients and 355 CTC-negative patients. Our meta-analysis revealed that patients in the CTC-positive group were significantly associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.25-4.00, P < 0.001). Furthermore, pancreatic cancer patients in the CTC-positive group also showed worse overall survival (OS) than those in the CTC-negative group (HR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.88-2.08, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity indicated that CTC-positive patients had poor OS among both Asian and Caucasian populations (all P < 0.05). Further subgroup analyses by detection and treatment methods also suggested that CTC-positive patients showed worser OS than CTC-negative patients in the majority of subgroups (all P < 0.05). No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that CTC-positive pancreatic cancer patients may have worser PFS and OS than CTC-negative patients. Detection of CTC in peripheral blood may be a promising biomarker for the detection and prognosis of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalHumansOdds RatioPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID24218336
OpenAlexW1982078244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.