ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2013
An improved method on isolation and serial passage of Chlamydia pneumoniae from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional method for Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn) isolation and propagation is technically challenging and time-consuming. Here, we developed a method to improve the isolation and passage of Cpn collected from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs).
methodsPBMCs positive with Cpn antigen (Cpn-Ag) were isolated, then centrifuged and cultured with Hep-2 cells after being broken. Cells were broken again and put into new Hep-2 cells to finish totally four passages with isolated and imported Cpn. Microimmunofluorescence method was used to detect Cpn. Inclusion forming unit (IFU) number was counted for each passage. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used to detect Cpn DNA. Efficiency of different centrifugation modes was compared.
resultsHep-2 cells of the first and second passages were strong positive with Cpn-Ag, the third passage was positive, and the fourth negative. Degeneration appeared in the fourth passage for isolated Cpn and third passage for imported strain. Centrifugation mode of 1,000 rpm for 2 h was the most efficient for Cpn propagation and passage.
conclusionThis simplified method achieved efficient isolation, propagation, and passage of Cpn from PBMCs, and isolated strain was superior to imported strain on propagating ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.