Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218114›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2014

Intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab for cerebellar ataxia with glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies.

Vincent Planche, Ana Marques, Miguel Ulla, Marc Ruivard, Franck Durif

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Treatment of Cerebellar Ataxia in the Context of Systemic Diseases.Current treatment options in neurology · 2017
    Review
  7. Cerebellar disease associated with anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies: review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent PlancheService de Neurologie, CHU Gabriel Montpied, 58 rue Montalembert, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France, planche.vincent@gmail.com.
Ana Marques
Miguel Ulla
Marc Ruivard
Franck Durif
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar ataxia associated with glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GAD-ab) is a rare and usually slow progressive disease with moderate to severe gait and limb ataxia, dysarthria, and nystagmus. The treatment for this condition is still being discussed. We report the cases of three patients with GAD-ab cerebellar ataxia treated successively with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and rituximab. Symptoms improved in one case after rituximab therapy and were stabilized in another after a combined therapy of IVIg and rituximab. The third patient continued to worsen despite these treatments. We conclude that IVIg and rituximab therapy could improve or stabilize GAD-ab cerebellar ataxia. Early treatment, the lack of cerebellar atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging, and a subacute onset of the symptoms could be decisive prognostic factors.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAutoantibodiesCerebellar AtaxiaFemaleGlutamate DecarboxylaseHumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRituximabTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAutoantibodiesGlutamate DecarboxylaseImmunoglobulins, IntravenousRituximab

Identifiers

PMID24218114
OpenAlexW2003374727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.