Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218093›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2013

[Morbidity and mortality of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion].

J O W Pelz, C-T Germer

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J O W PelzAbteilung für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, Julius Maximilians Universität Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland, pelz_j@ukw.de.
C-T Germer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (PIC) is a treatment option for peritoneal surface malignancy. Despite the survival benefits, this treatment was previously associated with a high morbidity and mortality rates, and the perception of the poor perioperative outcomes associated with this regimen remains. Careful patient selection with an optimal level of postoperative care must be advocated to avoid undesirable complications of this treatment.However, for this treatment to be accepted as standard of care, teams undertaking this treatment strategy must aim to minimize morbidity and mortality by learning from the experience of established centers and using the "global learning curve". The HIPEC Registry and accreditation of centers will improve the quality of the treatment.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional PerfusionCombined Modality TherapyCooperative BehaviorHyperthermia, InducedInfusions, ParenteralInterdisciplinary CommunicationNeoplasm StagingPatient SelectionPeritoneal NeoplasmsPeritoneumPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.