Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24218035›Full record

Trial reportTargeted oncology2014

Low level of baseline circulating VEGF-A is associated with better outcome in patients with vascular sarcomas receiving sorafenib: an ancillary study from a phase II trial.

Nicolas Penel, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Christine Bal-Mahieu, Christine Chevreau, Axel Le Cesne, Antoine Italiano, Emmanuelle Bompas, Stéphanie Clisant, Brigitte Baldeyrou, Amélie Lansiaux and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Targeted oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Management of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: an Update Review.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Angiosarcoma: a review of diagnosis and current treatment.American journal of cancer research · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas PenelMedical Oncology Department, Center Oscar Lambret, 3, rue F Combemale, 59020, Lille Cedex, France, scientifique@o-lambret.fr.
Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Christine Bal-Mahieu
Christine Chevreau
Axel Le Cesne
Antoine Italiano
Emmanuelle Bompas
Stéphanie Clisant
Brigitte Baldeyrou
Amélie Lansiaux
Yves-Marie Robin
Jacques-Olivier Bay
Sophie Piperno-Neumann
Jean-Yves Blay
Charles Fournier
Centre Oscar Lambret · FRCentre Léon Bérard · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRInstitut Curie · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have carried out a stratified phase II study of sorafenib (So) in patients with advanced angiosarcoma (n = 32) and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (n = 13). This report concerns the correlative analysis of the predictive values of circulating pro/anti-angiogenetic biomarkers. Using the ELISA method (R&D Systems), circulating biomarkers (VEGF-A, in picograms per milliliter), thrombospondin-1 (TSP1, in micrograms per milliliter), stem cell factor (SCF, in picograms per milliliter), placental growth factor (PlGF, in picograms per milliliter), VEGF-C (in picograms per milliliter), and E-selectin (in nanograms per milliliter) were measured before So treatment and after 7 days. VEGF-A (mean value 475 vs. 541, p = 0.002), TSP1 (16 vs. 24, p = 0.0002), and PlGF (20.9 vs. 40.7, p = 0.0001) significantly increased during the treatment. Treatment did not affect the levels of SCF, VEGF-C, and E-selectin. Only two biomarkers were associated with better outcome as follows: VEGF-A and PlGF. Best objective response and non-progression at 180 days were associated with low level of VEGF-A at baseline (p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). There was a correlation between the circulating level of VEGF-A and time to progression (TTP) (r = -0.47, p = 0.001). Best objective response and non-progression at 180 days were not associated with baseline level of PIGF, but there was a correlation between the circulating level of PIGF at baseline and TTP. Low level of VEGF-A at baseline (<500) was significantly associated with better outcome.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHemangioendothelioma, EpithelioidHemangiosarcomaHumansNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibTreatment OutcomeVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID24218035
OpenAlexW2076911447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.