Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24217976›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2014

Voice-related modulation of mechanosensory detection thresholds in the human larynx.

Michael J Hammer, Mallory A Krueger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanotransduction in the Vocal Fold Microenvironment: A Narrative Review.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Orofacial Somatosensory System Is Modulated During Speech Planning and Production.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  8. The role of laryngeal electromyography in vagus nerve stimulation-related vocal fold dysmotility.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J HammerDivision of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Room K4/769 Clinical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA, hammer@surgery.wisc.edu.
Mallory A Krueger

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (UW-Madison)KL2RR025012 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$11.1M
Does Intensive Voice Therapy Improve Airway Protection in Parkinsons DiseaseR03DC010900 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HAMMER, MICHAEL J · 2010 to 2012
$436k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025012NCRR NIH HHS RR025012NIDCD NIH HHS DC010900NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC010900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors within the laryngeal mucosa provide the central nervous system with perceptual and proprioceptive afference for a variety of essential yet diverse human functions including voice sound production and airway protection. It is unknown why mechanosensory information that yields a defensive response when an individual breathes may go largely unnoticed when the individual voices. Therefore, a central question is whether there is voice-related modulation of laryngeal mechanosensory detection. Such modulation would be consistent with current models of afferent laryngeal control, and may be important to maintain fluent voice in the presence of potentially distracting sensory input. Therefore, we employed endoscopic assessment of laryngeal mechanosensory detection thresholds in ten healthy adults during tidal breathing and a voice task. We tested the hypothesis that laryngeal mechanosensory detection thresholds would be higher during the voice task. We found that thresholds were significantly higher for all participants during the voice task and that these changes were significantly more modest in women. Our findings suggest that the laryngeal sensorium may modulate mechanosensory afference to attenuate the potentially distracting influence of sensory input during voice. The finding that women maintain a greater sensitivity during the voice task than men (lower thresholds) may have important implications for the higher prevalence of sensorimotor voice disturbances in women. Our results are consistent with the presence of mechanosensory modulation in other motor systems and with observed sensory differences between women and men. Such modulation has important implications for understanding the underlying neural mechanisms of laryngeal control and how these mechanisms may operate in individuals with laryngeal disturbances.

Indexed as

RespirationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLaryngeal MusclesLarynxMaleMechanoreceptorsSensory ThresholdsSex FactorsSpeechVoiceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24217976
PMCPMC3979554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.