ArticleNucleic acids research2014
Current status and new features of the Consensus Coding Sequence database.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Genomic and Structural Context Could Shape JAK-STAT Variant Pathogenicity.Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies · 2026Article
- MicroRNAs and rs1803274 SNP-based BuChe downregulation are associated with metabolic syndrome through ghrelin hydrolysis and expression quantitative trait loci regulation in PD patients.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
- HuR controls glutaminase RNA metabolism.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A newly identified gene Ahed plays essential roles in murine haematopoiesis.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Recurring EPHB1 mutations in human cancers alter receptor signalling and compartmentalisation of colorectal cancer cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Article
- Constructing and interpreting a large-scale variant effect map for an ultrarare disease gene: Comprehensive prediction of the functional impact of PSAT1 genotypes.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Recovering false negatives in CRISPR fitness screens with JLOE.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Identifying genes with conserved splicing structure and orthologous isoforms in human, mouse and dog.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Current status and future perspectives of the evaluation of missense variants by using three-dimensional structures of proteins.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2022Article
- Exploration of databases and methods supporting drug repurposing: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Genome-wide transcriptome study using deep RNA sequencing for myocardial infarction and coronary artery calcification.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- LincRNA-immunity landscape analysis identifies EPIC1 as a regulator of tumor immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance.Science advances · 2021Article
- Multiplex enCas12a screens detect functional buffering among paralogs otherwise masked in monogenic Cas9 knockout screens.Genome biology · 2020Article
- Alternative Splicing of the SLCO1B1 Gene: An Exploratory Analysis of Isoform Diversity in Pediatric Liver.Clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Gene family information facilitates variant interpretation and identification of disease-associated genes in neurodevelopmental disorders.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- Epigenetic plasticity of enhancers in cancer.Transcription · 2020Review
- Quality of whole genome sequencing from blood versus saliva derived DNA in cardiac patients.BMC medical genomics · 2020Article
- A heterodimer of evolved designer-recombinases precisely excises a human genomic DNA locus.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Identifying Discriminative Biological Function Features and Rules for Cancer-Related Long Non-coding RNAs.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Formation of human long intergenic non-coding RNA genes, pseudogenes, and protein genes: Ancestral sequences are key players.PloS one · 2020Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
43 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The Consensus Coding Sequence (CCDS) project (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CCDS/) is a collaborative effort to maintain a dataset of protein-coding regions that are identically annotated on the human and mouse reference genome assemblies by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Ensembl genome annotation pipelines. Identical annotations that pass quality assurance tests are tracked with a stable identifier (CCDS ID). Members of the collaboration, who are from NCBI, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the University of California Santa Cruz, provide coordinated and continuous review of the dataset to ensure high-quality CCDS representations. We describe here the current status and recent growth in the CCDS dataset, as well as recent changes to the CCDS web and FTP sites. These changes include more explicit reporting about the NCBI and Ensembl annotation releases being compared, new search and display options, the addition of biologically descriptive information and our approach to representing genes for which support evidence is incomplete. We also present a summary of recent and future curation targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.