Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24217900›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2014

Differential effects of opioid-related ligands and NSAIDs in nonhuman primate models of acute and inflammatory pain.

Devki D Sukhtankar, Heeseung Lee, Kenner C Rice, Mei-Chuan Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Effects of NOP-Related Ligands in Nonhuman Primates.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A novel orvinol analog, BU08028, as a safe opioid analgesic without abuse liability in primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Devki D SukhtankarDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA, dsukhtan@wakehealth.edu.
Heeseung Lee
Kenner C Rice
Mei-Chuan Ko
Wake Forest University · USEwha Womans University · KRNational Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Medicinal Chemistry of Drugs Acting on Central and Peripheral Opioid ReceptorsZIADA000527 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI RICE, KENNER · 2009 to 2025
$23.2M
Pharmacological Studies of NOP ReceptorsR01DA032568 · NIDA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Behavioral Pharmacology of ItchR01AR059193 · NIAMS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KO, MEI-CHUAN · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000527NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059193NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-059193NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032568NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-032568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleCarrageenan-induced hyperalgesia is a widely used pain model in rodents. However, characteristics of carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia and effects of analgesic drugs under these conditions are unknown in nonhuman primates.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to develop carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia in rhesus monkeys and determine the efficacy and potency of agonists selective for the four opioid receptor subtypes in this model versus acute pain, as compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

resultsTail injection of carrageenan produced long-lasting thermal hyperalgesia in monkeys. Systemically administered agonists selective for opioid receptor subtypes, i.e., fentanyl (mu/MOP), U-50488H (kappa/KOP), SNC80 (delta/DOP) and Ro 64-6198 (nociceptin/orphanin FQ/NOP) dose-dependently attenuated carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia with different potencies. In absence of carrageenan, these agonists, except SNC80, blocked acute thermal nociception. Opioid-related ligands, especially Ro 64-6198, were much more potent for their antihyperalgesic than antinociceptive effects. Both effects were mediated by the corresponding receptor mechanisms. Only fentanyl produced scratching at antihyperalgesic and antinociceptive doses consistent with its pruritic effects in humans, illustrating a translational profile of MOP agonists in nonhuman primates. Similar to SNC80, systemically administered NSAIDs ketorolac and naproxen dose-dependently attenuated carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia but not acute nociception.

conclusionUsing two different pain modalities in nonhuman primates, effectiveness of clinically available analgesics like fentanyl, ketorolac and naproxen was distinguished and their efficacies and potencies were compared with the selective KOP, DOP, and NOP agonists. The opioid-related ligands displayed differential pharmacological properties in regulating hyperalgesia and acute nociception in the same subjects. Such preclinical primate models can be used to investigate novel analgesic agents.

Indexed as

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-IsomerAcute PainAnalgesics, OpioidAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzamidesCarrageenanDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFentanylHyperalgesiaImidazolesInflammationMacacaMale3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cyclohexyl)-benzeneacetamide, (trans)-Isomer4-(alpha-(4-allyl-2,5-dimethyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl)-N,N-diethylbenzamideAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBenzamidesCarrageenanFentanylImidazolesPiperazinesReceptors, OpioidRo 64-6198Spiro Compounds

Identifiers

PMID24217900
PMCPMC3954905
OpenAlexW2096875748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.