Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24216981›Full record

ArticleCancers2013

Glioma surgical aspirate: a viable source of tumor tissue for experimental research.

Bryan W Day, Brett W Stringer, John Wilson, Rosalind L Jeffree, Paul R Jamieson, Kathleen S Ensbey, Zara C Bruce, Po Inglis, Suzanne Allan, Craig Winter and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Fiber alignment in 3D collagen networks as a biophysical marker for cell contractility.Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Bryan W DayBrain Cancer Research Unit & Leukaemia Foundation Research Unit, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia. bryan.day@qimr.edu.au.
Brett W Stringer
John Wilson
Rosalind L Jeffree
Paul R Jamieson
Kathleen S Ensbey
Zara C Bruce
Po Inglis
Suzanne Allan
Craig Winter
Gert Tollesson
Scott Campbell
Peter Lucas
Wendy Findlay
David Kadrian
David Johnson
Thomas Robertson
Terrance G Johns
Perry F Bartlett
Geoffrey W Osborne
Andrew W Boyd
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Queensland · AULeukaemia Foundation of Queensland · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUMonash Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain cancer research has been hampered by a paucity of viable clinical tissue of sufficient quality and quantity for experimental research. This has driven researchers to rely heavily on long term cultured cells which no longer represent the cancers from which they were derived. Resection of brain tumors, particularly at the interface between normal and tumorigenic tissue, can be carried out using an ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) that deposits liquid (blood and irrigation fluid) and resected tissue into a sterile bottle for disposal. To determine the utility of CUSA-derived glioma tissue for experimental research, we collected 48 CUSA specimen bottles from glioma patients and analyzed both the solid tissue fragments and dissociated tumor cells suspended in the liquid waste fraction. We investigated if these fractions would be useful for analyzing tumor heterogeneity, using IHC and multi-parameter flow cytometry; we also assessed culture generation and orthotopic xenograft potential. Both cell sources proved to be an abundant, highly viable source of live tumor cells for cytometric analysis, animal studies and in-vitro studies. Our findings demonstrate that CUSA tissue represents an abundant viable source to conduct experimental research and to carry out diagnostic analyses by flow cytometry or other molecular diagnostic procedures.

Identifiers

PMID24216981
PMCPMC3730332
OpenAlexW2013698995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.