Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24216768›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2014

Novel mutations in penicillin-binding protein genes in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates that are methicillin resistant on susceptibility testing, but lack the mec gene.

Xiaoliang Ba, Ewan M Harrison, Giles F Edwards, Matthew T G Holden, Anders Rhod Larsen, Andreas Petersen, Robert L Skov, Sharon J Peacock, Julian Parkhill, Gavin K Paterson and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genomic Characterization and Virulence Determinants ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Borderline Oxacillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ceftaroline Exhibits PromisingInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Genetic and Phenotypic Changes Related to the Development ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biofilm forming multidrug resistantIranian journal of veterinary research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Accessory Genome Dynamics of Local and GlobalFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Mutations in theMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  19. Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Lineages ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoliang BaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ewan M Harrison
Giles F Edwards
Matthew T G Holden
Anders Rhod Larsen
Andreas Petersen
Robert L Skov
Sharon J Peacock
Julian Parkhill
Gavin K Paterson
Mark A Holmes
University of Cambridge · GBStatens Serum Institut · DKWellcome Sanger Institute · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1001787Medical Research Council G1001787/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important global health problem. MRSA resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is mediated by the mecA or mecC genes, which encode an alternative penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2a that has a low affinity to β-lactam antibiotics. Detection of mec genes or PBP2a is regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis of MRSA. We identified four MRSA isolates that lacked mecA or mecC genes, but were still phenotypically resistant to pencillinase-resistant β-lactam antibiotics.

methodsThe four human S. aureus isolates were investigated by whole genome sequencing and a range of phenotypic assays.

resultsWe identified a number of amino acid substitutions present in the endogenous PBPs 1, 2 and 3 that were found in the resistant isolates but were absent in closely related susceptible isolates and which may be the basis of resistance. Of particular interest are three identical amino acid substitutions in PBPs 1, 2 and 3, occurring independently in isolates from at least two separate multilocus sequence types. Two different non-conservative substitutions were also present in the same amino acid of PBP1 in two isolates from two different sequence types.

conclusionsThis work suggests that phenotypically resistant MRSA could be misdiagnosed using molecular methods alone and provides evidence of alternative mechanisms for β-lactam resistance in MRSA that may need to be considered by diagnostic laboratories.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutant ProteinsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAStaphylococcal InfectionsDNA, BacterialMutant ProteinsPenicillin-Binding ProteinsmecAmecCMRSAβ-lactams

Identifiers

PMID24216768
PMCPMC3922151
OpenAlexW2117262267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.