Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24216722›Full record

ArticlePublic health genomics2014

Perceptions of African-American health professionals and community members on the participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research.

E M Ngui, T D Warner, L W Roberts

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Successful recruitment and retention of diverse participants in a genomics clinical trial: a good invitation to a great party.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

E M NguiDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health Promotion, Joseph J. Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wis., USA.
T D Warner
L W Roberts
Stanford University · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Ethics and Safeguards in Psychiatric ResearchR01MH074080 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERTS, LAURA W · 2006 to 2010
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074080PHS HHS NIMH3R01MH074080PHS HHS NIMH3R01MH074080-03S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs genetic research gains more prominence in society, ethical concerns and the need for safeguards in the participation of children and pregnant women have increased. This study examined the perspectives of African-American health professional and community members on genetic research involving children and pregnant women.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods approach to collect and analyze survey data and qualitative data from focus groups of community members and structured interviews of health professionals.

resultsWe found that community members had significantly more favorable attitudes toward participation of children and pregnant women in genetic research than health professionals. Health professionals did not differ significantly from community members in their perceived understanding of genetic research. Emergent themes included limited knowledge of genetic research and distinction of biomedical research and clinical care, ethical concerns about confidentiality and potential harm, and the need to protect children and pregnant women. Participants expressed high interest and favorable attitude towards genetic research, despite limited genetic knowledge and concerns of potential harm to children and pregnant women. Some participants felt that genetic research findings could help dispel stigma and reduce discrimination, especially in mental illness.

conclusionFindings suggest that the recruitment of participants into genetic research should directly address privacy and benefit concerns, and limited knowledge of physical and mental illness genetic research. There is a critical need to invest and engage racial/ethnic communities early, provide education on genetics, mental illness, and translate and share research findings with these communities.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthGenetic ResearchAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanChildCommunity ParticipationFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID24216722
PMCPMC4014201
OpenAlexW2058111355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.