ArticleBMC psychiatry2013
A feasibility study of expert patient and community mental health team led bipolar psychoeducation groups: implementing an evidence based practice.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A nurse navigator program for the management of hepatitis C virus in patients with severe mental disorder. A feasibility trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Clinical and functioning outcomes during the establishment phase of Ukraine's community mental health teams: a descriptive analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- The Type, Impacts, and Experiences of Peer Support for People Living With Bipolar Disorder: A Scoping Review.Bipolar disorders · 2025Article
- A realist review of medication optimisation of community dwelling service users with serious mental illness.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Review
- Implementation of a crisis resolution team service improvement programme: a qualitative study of the critical ingredients for success.International journal of mental health systems · 2024Article
- A feasibility study of provider-level implementation strategies to improve access to colorectal cancer screening for patients with schizophrenia: ACCESS2 (N-EQUITY 2104) trial.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Psychoeducation on Burden among Family Caregivers of Adults with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nursing research and practice · 2023Review
- Factors Influencing Attendees' Engagement with Group Psychoeducation: A Multi-stakeholder Perspective.Administration and policy in mental health · 2022Article
- Article
- Atrial Fibrillation and Depression: A Bibliometric Analysis From 2001 to 2021.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Factors impacting the implementation of a psychoeducation intervention within the mental health system: a multisite study using the consolidation framework for implementation research.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- How should a virtual agent present psychoeducation? Influence of verbal and textual presentation on adherence.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2017Article
- Service user experiences of REFOCUS: a process evaluation of a pro-recovery complex intervention.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGroup psychoeducation is a cost effective intervention which reduces relapse and improves functioning in bipolar disorder but is rarely implemented. The aim of this study was to identify the acceptability and feasibility of a group psychoeducation programme delivered by community mental health teams (CMHTs) and peer specialist (PS) facilitators. Organisational learning was used to identify and address systematically barriers and enablers, at organisational, health professional and patient levels, to its implementation into a routine service.
methodsA systematic examination of barriers and enablers to a three day training process informed the delivery of a first treatment group and a similar process informed the delivery of the second treatment group. Triangulation of research methods improved its internal validity: direct observation of training, self-rated surveys of participant experiences, group discussion, and thematically analysed individual participant and facilitator interviews were employed.
resultsBarriers and enablers were identified at organisational, educational, treatment content, facilitator and patient levels. All barriers under the control of the research team were addressed with subsequent improvements in patient knowledge about the condition and about local service. In addition, self-management, agency and altruism were enhanced. Barriers that could not be addressed required senior clinical and education leadership outside the research team's control. PS and professional facilitators were successfully trained and worked together to deliver groups which were generally reported as being beneficial.
conclusionPsychoeducation groups involving CMHT and PS facilitators is acceptable and feasible but their sustainment requires senior leadership within and outside the organisation that control finance and education services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.