Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24215312›Full record

SynthesisCurrent drug safety2013

CARING (CAncer Risk and INsulin analoGues): the association of diabetes mellitus and cancer risk with focus on possible determinants - a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

Jakob Starup-Linde, Oystein Karlstad, Stine Aistrup Eriksen, Peter Vestergaard, Heleen K Bronsveld, Frank de Vries, Morten Andersen, Anssi Auvinen, Jari Haukka, Vidar Hjellvik and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current drug safety, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Associations between Diabetes Mellitus and Selected Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The odds of neoplasia in dogs with and without diabetes mellitus.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jakob Starup-Linde
Oystein Karlstad
Stine Aistrup Eriksen
Peter Vestergaard
Heleen K Bronsveld
Frank de Vries
Morten Andersen
Anssi Auvinen
Jari Haukka
Vidar Hjellvik
Marloes T Bazelier
Anthonius de Boer
Kari Furu
Marie L De BruinDepartment of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine (MEA), Aarhus University Hospital, Tage Hansens Gade 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. jakolind@rm.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients suffering from diabetes mellitus (DM) may experience an increased risk of cancer; however, it is not certain whether this effect is due to diabetes per se.

objectiveTo examine the association between DM and cancers by a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. DATA SOURCES: The systematic literature search includes Medline at PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Bibliotek.dk, Cochrane library, Web of Science and SveMed+ with the search terms: "Diabetes mellitus", "Neoplasms", and "Risk of cancer". STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The included studies compared the risk of cancer in diabetic patients versus non-diabetic patients. All types of observational study designs were included.

resultsDiabetes patients were at a substantially increased risk of liver (RR=2.1), and pancreas (RR=2.2) cancer. Modestly elevated significant risks were also found for ovary (RR=1.2), breast (RR=1.1), cervix (RR=1.3), endometrial (RR=1.4), several digestive tract (RR=1.1-1.5), kidney (RR=1.4), and bladder cancer (RR=1.1). The findings were similar for men and women, and unrelated to study design. Meta-regression analyses showed limited effect modification of body mass index, and possible effect modification of age, gender, with some influence of study characteristics (population source, cancer- and diabetes ascertainment). LIMITATIONS: Publication bias seemed to be present. Only published data were used in the analyses.

conclusionsThe systematic review and meta-analysis confirm the previous results of increased cancer risk in diabetes and extend this to additional cancer sites. Physicians in contact with patients with diabetes should be aware that diabetes patients are at an increased risk of cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInsulinMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPublication BiasRegression AnalysisHypoglycemic AgentsInsulin

Identifiers

PMID24215312
PMCPMC5421136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.