Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24215206›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2013

Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella enterica from the feces of cattle, poultry, swine and hedgehogs in Burkina Faso and their comparison to human Salmonella isolates.

Assèta Kagambèga, Taru Lienemann, Laura Aulu, Alfred S Traoré, Nicolas Barro, Anja Siitonen, Kaisa Haukka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Characteristics of NontyphoidAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Spatiotemporal Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Genetic Relationship betweenAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A multi-provincialCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Assèta KagambègaBacteriology Unit, Department of Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland. kagamas2007@yahoo.fr.
Taru Lienemann
Laura Aulu
Alfred S Traoré
Nicolas Barro
Anja Siitonen
Kaisa Haukka
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversité Joseph Ki-Zerbo · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProduction and wild animals are major sources of human salmonellosis and animals raised for food also play an important role in transmission of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella strains to humans. Furthermore, in sub-Saharan Africa non-typhoidal Salmonella serotypes are common bloodstream isolates in febrile patients. Yet, little is known about the environmental reservoirs and predominant modes of transmission of these pathogens. The purpose of this study was to discover potential sources and distribution vehicles of Salmonella by isolating strains from apparently healthy slaughtered food animals and wild hedgehogs and by determining the genetic relatedness between the strains and human isolates. For this purpose, 729 feces samples from apparently healthy slaughtered cattle (n = 304), poultry (n = 350), swine (n = 50) and hedgehogs (n = 25) were examined for the presence of Salmonella enterica in Burkina Faso. The isolates were characterized by serotyping, antimicrobial-susceptibility testing, phage typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with XbaI and BlnI restriction enzymes.

resultsOf the 729 feces samples, 383 (53%) contained Salmonella, representing a total of 81 different serotypes. Salmonella was present in 52% of the cattle, 55% of the poultry, 16% of the swine and 96% of the hedgehog feces samples. Antimicrobial resistance was detected in 14% of the isolates. S. Typhimurium isolates from poultry and humans (obtained from a previous study) were multiresistant to the same antimicrobials (ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfonamides and trimethoprim), had the same phage type DT 56 and were closely related in PFGE. S. Muenster isolates from hedgehogs had similar PFGE patterns as the domestic animals.

conclusionsBased on our results it seems that production and wild animals can share the same Salmonella serotypes and potentially transmit some of them to humans. As the humans and animals often live in close vicinity in Africa and the hygiene control of the meat retail chain is defective, high Salmonella carriage rates of the animals can pose a major public health risk in Burkina Faso. This underlines the necessity for a joint and coordinated surveillance and monitoring programs for salmonellosis in Africa.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteriophage TypingBurkina FasoCarrier StateCattleElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldFecesHedgehogsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular TypingPoultryPrevalenceSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, Animal

Identifiers

PMID24215206
PMCPMC3828578
OpenAlexW2062827298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.