ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2014
Selective importance of the rat anterior thalamic nuclei for configural learning involving distal spatial cues.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anterior thalamic nuclei: A critical substrate for non-spatial paired-associate memory in rats.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Time to retire the serial Papez circuit: Implications for space, memory, and attention.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Review
- The limbic memory circuit and the neural basis of contextual memory.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2022Article
- Midline Thalamic Damage Associated with Alcohol-Use Disorders: Disruption of Distinct Thalamocortical Pathways and Function.Neuropsychology review · 2021Review
- The anterior thalamic nuclei and cognition: A role beyond space?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Time to put the mammillothalamic pathway into context.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- The anterior thalamic nuclei and nucleus reuniens: So similar but so different.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2020Review
- Do the rat anterior thalamic nuclei contribute to behavioural flexibility?Behavioural brain research · 2019Article
- Anterior thalamic nuclei, but not retrosplenial cortex, lesions abolish latent inhibition in rats.Behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Why do lesions in the rodent anterior thalamic nuclei cause such severe spatial deficits?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
- How do mammillary body inputs contribute to anterior thalamic function?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
- The impact of fornix lesions in rats on spatial learning tasks sensitive to anterior thalamic and hippocampal damage.Behavioural brain research · 2015Article
- The impact of anterior thalamic lesions on active and passive spatial learning in stimulus controlled environments: geometric cues and pattern arrangement.Behavioral neuroscience · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To test potential parallels between hippocampal and anterior thalamic function, rats with anterior thalamic lesions were trained on a series of biconditional learning tasks. The anterior thalamic lesions did not disrupt learning two biconditional associations in operant chambers where a specific auditory stimulus (tone or click) had a differential outcome depending on whether it was paired with a particular visual context (spot or checkered wall-paper) or a particular thermal context (warm or cool). Likewise, rats with anterior thalamic lesions successfully learnt a biconditional task when they were reinforced for digging in one of two distinct cups (containing either beads or shredded paper), depending on the particular appearance of the local context on which the cup was placed (one of two textured floors). In contrast, the same rats were severely impaired at learning the biconditional rule to select a specific cup when in a particular location within the test room. Place learning was then tested with a series of go/no-go discriminations. Rats with anterior thalamic nuclei lesions could learn to discriminate between two locations when they were approached from a constant direction. They could not, however, use this acquired location information to solve a subsequent spatial biconditional task where those same places dictated the correct choice of digging cup. Anterior thalamic lesions produced a selective, but severe, biconditional learning deficit when the task incorporated distal spatial cues. This deficit mirrors that seen in rats with hippocampal lesions, so extending potential interdependencies between the two sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.