Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24214932›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2014

Identifying cognitive remediation change through computational modelling--effects on reinforcement learning in schizophrenia.

Matteo Cella, Anthony J Bishara, Evelina Medin, Sarah Swan, Clare Reeder, Til Wykes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neural Circuitry of Salience and Reward Processing in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  12. Computational Methods in Psychotherapy: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Progress in Schizophrenia Research and Treatment.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matteo CellaDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK; matteo.cella@kcl.ac.uk.
Anthony J BisharaDepartment of Psychology, College of Charleston, SC.
Evelina MedinDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK;
Sarah SwanDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK;
Clare ReederDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK;
Til WykesDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, UK;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveConverging research suggests that individuals with schizophrenia show a marked impairment in reinforcement learning, particularly in tasks requiring flexibility and adaptation. The problem has been associated with dopamine reward systems. This study explores, for the first time, the characteristics of this impairment and how it is affected by a behavioral intervention-cognitive remediation.

methodUsing computational modelling, 3 reinforcement learning parameters based on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) trial-by-trial performance were estimated: R (reward sensitivity), P (punishment sensitivity), and D (choice consistency). In Study 1 the parameters were compared between a group of individuals with schizophrenia (n = 100) and a healthy control group (n = 50). In Study 2 the effect of cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) on these parameters was assessed in 2 groups of individuals with schizophrenia, one receiving CRT (n = 37) and the other receiving treatment as usual (TAU, n = 34).

resultsIn Study 1 individuals with schizophrenia showed impairment in the R and P parameters compared with healthy controls. Study 2 demonstrated that sensitivity to negative feedback (P) and reward (R) improved in the CRT group after therapy compared with the TAU group. R and P parameter change correlated with WCST outputs. Improvements in R and P after CRT were associated with working memory gains and reduction of negative symptoms, respectively.

conclusionSchizophrenia reinforcement learning difficulties negatively influence performance in shift learning tasks. CRT can improve sensitivity to reward and punishment. Identifying parameters that show change may be useful in experimental medicine studies to identify cognitive domains susceptible to improvement.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalReinforcement, PsychologyRewardAdultChoice BehaviorCognitive Behavioral TherapyFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPunishmentSchizophreniaTreatment Outcomecognitive remediationdopaminereward sensitivityreward systemssensitivitytherapyWisconsin Card Sorting test

Identifiers

PMID24214932
PMCPMC4193689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.