Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24214526›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2014

Quantification of amide proton transfer effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent administration.

Yee Kai Tee, Manus J Donahue, George W J Harston, Stephen J Payne, Michael A Chappell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mitigation of TRadiology advances · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical applications of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Selecting the reference image for registration of CEST series.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yee Kai TeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK; Centre for Doctoral Training in Healthcare Innovation, University of Oxford, UK.
Manus J Donahue
George W J Harston
Stephen J Payne
Michael A Chappell
University of Oxford · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT088877/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare quantification of the amide proton transfer (APT) effect pre- and post-gadolinium contrast agent (Gd) administration in order to establish to what extent Gd alters quantification of the APT effect. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour patients with internal carotid stenosis were recruited. APT imaging was acquired pre- and post-contrast in two sessions (before and after surgery) to assess the extent of relaxation time, T1 , change on APT effect calculated using magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry analysis at offsets of ±3.5 ppm relative to water resonance. Statistical and modeling evaluations were performed on the pre- and post-contrast APT effect to study the sensitivity to contrast administration.

resultsBefore surgery, the post-contrast T1 was estimated to drop <10% of the pre-value for the majority of the patients. After surgery, higher post-contrast T1 reductions were observed in all the patients (maximum decrease was about 20% of the pre-value). Consistent differences between pre- and post-contrast were seen in the APT effect quantified using the asymmetry measure in most regions of the brain, with significant differences found in the white matter at the group level and in 25% of the individual patient results.

conclusionAPT imaging should be performed prior to Gd administration to avoid potential misinterpretation of the APT effect.

Indexed as

AmidesAlgorithmsCarotid StenosisContrast MediaGadoliniumHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyProtonsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityAmidesContrast MediaGadoliniumProtonsamide proton transfer (APT) imagingchemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaginggadolinium contrast agentsmagnetization transfer (MT) imaging

Identifiers

PMID24214526
PMCPMC5524170
OpenAlexW1963089761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.