Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24214341›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Dual phosphorylation of cdk1 coordinates cell proliferation with key developmental processes in Drosophila.

Joseph O Ayeni, Ramya Varadarajan, Oindrila Mukherjee, David T Stuart, Frank Sprenger, Martin Srayko, Shelagh D Campbell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regulation and coordination of the different DNA damage responses inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Kinesin 6 Regulation inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Small proline-rich protein 2B drives stress-dependent p53 degradation and fibroblast proliferation in heart failure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph O AyeniDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada.
Ramya Varadarajan
Oindrila Mukherjee
David T Stuart
Frank Sprenger
Martin Srayko
Shelagh D Campbell
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic organisms use conserved checkpoint mechanisms that regulate Cdk1 by inhibitory phosphorylation to prevent mitosis from interfering with DNA replication or repair. In metazoans, this checkpoint mechanism is also used for coordinating mitosis with dynamic developmental processes. Inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 is catalyzed by Wee1 kinases that phosphorylate tyrosine 15 (Y15) and dual-specificity Myt1 kinases found only in metazoans that phosphorylate Y15 and the adjacent threonine (T14) residue. Despite partially redundant roles in Cdk1 inhibitory phosphorylation, Wee1 and Myt1 serve specialized developmental functions that are not well understood. Here, we expressed wild-type and phospho-acceptor mutant Cdk1 proteins to investigate how biochemical differences in Cdk1 inhibitory phosphorylation influence Drosophila imaginal development. Phosphorylation of Cdk1 on Y15 appeared to be crucial for developmental and DNA damage-induced G2-phase checkpoint arrest, consistent with other evidence that Myt1 is the major Y15-directed Cdk1 inhibitory kinase at this stage of development. Expression of non-inhibitable Cdk1 also caused chromosome defects in larval neuroblasts that were not observed with Cdk1(Y15F) mutant proteins that were phosphorylated on T14, implicating Myt1 in a novel mechanism promoting genome stability. Collectively, these results suggest that dual inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 by Myt1 serves at least two functions during development. Phosphorylation of Y15 is essential for the premitotic checkpoint mechanism, whereas T14 phosphorylation facilitates accumulation of dually inhibited Cdk1-Cyclin B complexes that can be rapidly activated once checkpoint-arrested G2-phase cells are ready for mitosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCDC2 Protein KinaseCell ProliferationCyclin BDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEyeG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsGenomic InstabilityMitosisMitotic IndexPhosphorylationProtein KinasesWings, AnimalCDC2 Protein KinaseCycB protein, DrosophilaCyclin BDrosophila ProteinsMyt1 protein, DrosophilaProtein KinasesCdk1cell-cycle checkpointimaginal discsmitosisneuroblast

Identifiers

PMID24214341
PMCPMC3872185
OpenAlexW2156626258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.