ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry1995
Tandem mass spectrometric characterization of a specific cysteic acid residue in oxidized human apoprotein B-100.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 1995. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational investigation and hydrogen/deuterium exchange of the fixed charge derivative tris(2,4,6-trimethoxyphenyl) phosphonium: implications for the aspartic acid cleavage mechanism.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2005Article
- Fragmentation of protonated ions of peptides containing cysteine, cysteine sulfinic acid, and cysteine sulfonic acid.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2004Article
- Electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of peptides derived by enzymatic digestion of oxidized globin subunits: An improved method to determine amino acid substitution in the hemoglobin "core".Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 1996Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oxidation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) in vivo may result in its unregulated uptake by macrophages, with the consequent accumulation of cholesterol that is characteristic of the development of atherosclerosis. This paper describes initial experiments to elucidate structural changes that occur in an in vitro model of LDL oxidation. LDL was isolated from human blood and oxidized in the presence of copper ion. Lipid was removed and the isolated apoprotein was subjected to tryptic hydrolysis. The hydrolysate was separated by high performance liquid chromatography and individual fractions were screened by amino acid analysis to detect cysteic acid residues. Appropriate fractions were analyzed by fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry and hybrid tandem mass spectrometry. In this manner a tryptic fragment was identified that corresponded to residues 4187-4195 (EELCTMFIR), in which the cysteine and methionine residues were oxidized to cysteic acid and methionine sulfoxide, respectively. Identical analysis of LDL not subjected to in vitro oxidation revealed no evidence for this oxidized peptide. Earlier work established a surface location for this cysteine residue (Cys24) on the LDL particle, which suggested that its modification may significantly affect the properties of LDL, such as the propensity to intermolecular interaction via disulfide bridges. The analytical protocol developed here (involving proteolysis, screening of peptide fragments, and tandem mass spectrometry analysis) constitutes a strategy of general applicability to the characterization of targeted modifications of large proteins via mass spectrometry.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.