Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24213619›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Impact of scar on SPECT assay of left ventricular contraction dyssynchrony.

Daniel R Ludwig, Mati Friehling, Erik B Schelbert, David Schwartzman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictive values of left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CRT response in heart failure patients with different pathophysiology.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Myocardial ischemia and previous infarction contribute to left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with coronary artery disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is myocardial viability related to left ventricular dyssynchrony?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Could myocardial viability be related to left ventricular dyssynchrony? Simultaneous evaluation by gated SPECT-MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony for CAD diagnosis: Does it have incremental clinical values?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nuclear image-guided left ventricular pacing lead navigation feasibility of a new technique.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel R LudwigHeart, Lung, and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Mati Friehling
Erik B Schelbert
David Schwartzman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany patients presently receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) do not respond. A disproportionate number of nonresponders have ischemic cardiomyopathy, with significant left ventricular (LV) scar burden. Current selection criteria, such as electrocardiography or echocardiography, may not reliably portray the magnitude of CRT-remediable LV contraction dyssynchrony. Although phase analysis of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) image data is increasingly appreciated as a tool for quantifying dyssynchrony, its use in the setting of scar has not been adequately evaluated.

methodsConsecutive patients with ischemic (ICM, n = 50) or nonischemic (NICM, n = 39) cardiomyopathy underwent SPECT imaging prior to receiving CRT. In each patient, phase analysis of the raw images was performed to yield a phase standard deviation (PSD), an index which varies directly with the magnitude of dyssynchrony. ICM patient image data were also reanalyzed after scarred segments were stripped away.

resultsRaw image analysis demonstrated that PSD was significantly larger among ICM (57 ± 17°) than NICM (35 ± 13°, p < 0.001) patients. Among ICM patients, PSD after stripping of scarred segments was significantly decreased (40 ± 13°, p < 0.001). Signals emanating from scarred segments were of low amplitude and presented a random pattern, suggestive of noise rather than indicating contraction.

conclusionPSD values may be spuriously increased by scar. These findings may be important when using SPECT in selecting ischemic cardiomyopathy patients for CRT.

Indexed as

Myocardial ContractionTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCicatrixCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.