Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24213474›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2013

Life history trade-offs in cancer evolution.

C Athena Aktipis, Amy M Boddy, Robert A Gatenby, Joel S Brown, Carlo C Maley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Multiscale Wisdom of the Body: Collective Intelligence as a Tractable Interface for Next-Generation Biomedicine.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C Athena Aktipis1] Center for Evolution and Cancer and the Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 2340 Sutter Street, BOX 1351, San Francisco, California 94143-1351, USA. [2] Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, PO Box 871104, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1104, USA.
Amy M Boddy
Robert A Gatenby
Joel S Brown
Carlo C Maley

Funding

The Physi(ologi)cal Microenvironment and its Role in Tumor Invasion and MetastaseU54CA143970 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2009 to 2014
$9.3M
Modeling Neoplastic Progression in Barrett's Esophagus - Renewal -2R01CA140657 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Carlo Maley · 2009 to 2026
$5.0M
Stem Cells, Differentiation and Therapeutic Resistance in AMLR01CA149566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CARROLL, MARTIN · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Application of Evolutionary Principles to Maintain Cancer Control (PQ21)R01CA170595 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
Modeling causes and consequences of the evolution of cell motility in neoplasmsF32CA144331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AKTIPIS, CHRISTINA ATHENA · 2010 to 2012
$159k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA144331NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140657NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149566NCI NIH HHS R01 CA170595NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic evolution during cancer progression and therapy results in tumour cells that show a wide range of phenotypes, which include rapid proliferation and quiescence. Evolutionary life history theory may help us to understand the diversity of these phenotypes. Fast life history organisms reproduce rapidly, whereas those with slow life histories show less fecundity and invest more resources in survival. Life history theory also provides an evolutionary framework for phenotypic plasticity, which has potential implications for understanding 'cancer stem cells'. Life history theory suggests that different therapy dosing schedules might select for fast or slow life history cell phenotypes, with important clinical consequences.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionCell ProliferationCell SurvivalDisease ProgressionHumansNeoplasmsPhenotypeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID24213474
PMCPMC4010142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.