Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24213154›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2014

Evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons using analytical methods, toxicology, and risk assessment research: seafood safety after a petroleum spill as an example.

Jeffrey Wickliffe, Edward Overton, Scott Frickel, Jessi Howard, Mark Wilson, Bridget Simon, Stephen Echsner, Daniel Nguyen, David Gauthe, Diane Blake and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Elevated Indoor Volatile Organic Compound Exposure in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey WickliffeDepartment of Global Environmental Health Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Edward Overton
Scott Frickel
Jessi Howard
Mark Wilson
Bridget Simon
Stephen Echsner
Daniel Nguyen
David Gauthe
Diane Blake
Charles Miller
Cornelis Elferink
Shakeel Ansari
Harshica Fernando
Edward Trapido
Andrew Kane
Tulane University · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USLouisiana State University · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Florida Health · USWashington State University · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Research Consortium for Gulf Resilience on Women's HealthU19ES020677 · NIEHS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI LICHTVELD, MAUREEN Y. · 2011 to 2015
$7.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS U01/U19 1U19ES20677-01NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES020677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are abundant and widespread environmental chemicals. They are produced naturally and through man-made processes, and they are common in organic media, including petroleum. Several PAHs are toxic, and a subset exhibit carcinogenic activity. PAHs represent a range of chemical structures based on two or more benzene rings and, depending on their source, can exhibit a variety of side modifications resulting from oxygenation, nitrogenation, and alkylation.

objectivesHere we discuss the increasing ability of contemporary analytical methods to distinguish not only different chemical structures among PAHs but also their concentrations in environmental media. Using seafood contamination following the Deepwater Horizon accident as an example, we identify issues that are emerging in the PAH risk assessment process because of increasing analytical sensitivity for individual PAHs, and we describe the paucity of toxicological literature for many of these compounds. DISCUSSION: PAHs, including the large variety of chemically modified or substituted PAHs, are naturally occurring and may constitute health risks if human populations are exposed to hazardous levels. However, toxicity evaluations have not kept pace with modern analytic methods and their increased ability to detect substituted PAHs. Therefore, although it is possible to measure these compounds in seafood and other media, we do not have sufficient information on the potential toxicity of these compounds to incorporate them into human health risk assessments and characterizations.

conclusionsFuture research efforts should strategically attempt to fill this toxicological knowledge gap so human health risk assessments of PAHs in environmental media or food can be better determined. This is especially important in the aftermath of petroleum spills.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringHumansPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRisk AssessmentSeafoodPetroleumPolycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

Identifiers

PMID24213154
PMCPMC3888570
OpenAlexW2157065684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.