Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24213127›Full record

ArticleCancers2011

Discriminating different cancer cells using a zebrafish in vivo assay.

Karni S Moshal, Karine F Ferri-Lagneau, Jamil Haider, Pooja Pardhanani, Tinchung Leung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inhibitory Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  9. Modeling of Solid-Tumor Microenvironment in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Larvae.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Zebrafish as a Model Organism for the Development of Drugs for Skin Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Frontiers in oncology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A fresh look at zebrafish from the perspective of cancer research.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karni S MoshalBiomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, North Carolina Research Campus, Nutrition Research Center, 500 Laureate Way, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA. tleung@nccu.edu.
Karine F Ferri-Lagneau
Jamil Haider
Pooja Pardhanani
Tinchung Leung
North Carolina Central University · US

Funding

ROLES OF INFLAMMATION AND ANDROGEN METABOLISM IN PROSTATE CANCER DISPARITYP20MD000175 · NIMHD · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI KIMBRO, KEVIN SEAN · 2002 to 2016
$15.6M
NCCU-BBRI/UNC-LINEBERGER PARTNERSHIP IN CANCER RESEARCHU56CA092077 · NCI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI RICHARDSON, MICHELER RICARDO · 2001 to 2008
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U56 CA092077NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the expanded understanding of tumor angiogenesis phenomenon and how it impacts cancer treatment outcomes, we have yet to develop a robust assay that can quickly, easily, and quantitatively measure tumor-induced angiogenesis. Since the zebrafish/tumor xenograft represents an emerging tool in this regard, the present study strives to capitalize on the ease, effectiveness, and the adaptability of this model to quantify tumor angiogenesis. In order to test a range of responses, we chose two different tumorigenic cell lines, the human non-small cell lung carcinoma (H1299) and the mouse lung adenocarcinoma (CL13). Non-tumorigenic 3T3-L1 cells served as negative control. The cells were grafted near to the perivitelline space of the zebrafish embryos and the angiogenic response was analyzed using whole-mount alkaline phosphatase (AP) vessel staining and fluorescence microscopy. Angiogenic activity was scored based on the length and number of the newly formed ectopic vessels and the percentage of embryos with ectopic vessels. At 2 day-post-implantation, we detected a significant increase in the length and number of ectopic vessels with H1299 cell implantation compared to CL13 cell transplantation, both are higher than 3T3-L1 control. We also observed a significantly higher percentage of embryos with ectopic vessels with H1299 and CL13 transplantation compared to the 3T3-L1 control, but this parameter is not as robust and reliable as measuring the length and number of ectopic vessels. Furthermore, the systemic exposure of zebrafish embryos to an anti-angiogenesis drug (PTK 787, inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase) inhibited tumor-induced angiogenesis, suggesting that the assay can be used to evaluate anti-angiogenic drugs. This study implicates the feasibility of using zebrafish xenotransplantation to perform quantitative measurement of the angiogenic activity of cancer cells which can be further extended to measure cancer cell metastasis. This assay represents not only the useful test for patient diagnosis, but also has the potential for evaluating anti-cancer drugs treatment.

Identifiers

PMID24213127
PMCPMC3763412
OpenAlexW2034320389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.