ArticleCancers2011
Discriminating different cancer cells using a zebrafish in vivo assay.
Article in Cancers, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zebrafish in Lung Cancer Research.Cancers · 2023Review
- The scaffold RhoGAP protein ARHGAP8/BPGAP1 synchronizes Rac and Rho signaling to facilitate cell migration.Molecular biology of the cell · 2023Article
- Advances in the Application of Preclinical Models in Photodynamic Therapy for Tumor: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Application of the CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing technique in basic research, diagnosis, and therapy of cancer.Molecular cancer · 2021Review
- Modeling oncolytic virus dynamics in the tumor microenvironment using zebrafish.Cancer gene therapy · 2021Article
- Nuclear exosome HMGB3 secreted by nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells promotes tumour metastasis by inducing angiogenesis.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- Targeted therapy of human leukemia xenografts in immunodeficient zebrafish.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Inhibitory Effects ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Modeling of Solid-Tumor Microenvironment in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio) Larvae.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Rab6 regulates cell migration and invasion by recruiting Cdc42 and modulating its activity.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Article
- Pilot Study of an Integrative New Tool for Studying Clinical Outcome Discrimination in Acute Leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- Non-mammalian models of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.Endocrine-related cancer · 2018Review
- Zebrafish as a Model Organism for the Development of Drugs for Skin Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Review
- Review
- A novel association of neuropilin-1 and MUC1 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: role in induction of VEGF signaling and angiogenesis.Oncogene · 2016Article
- Zebrafish xenotransplantation as a tool for in vivo cancer study.Familial cancer · 2015Review
- A fresh look at zebrafish from the perspective of cancer research.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the expanded understanding of tumor angiogenesis phenomenon and how it impacts cancer treatment outcomes, we have yet to develop a robust assay that can quickly, easily, and quantitatively measure tumor-induced angiogenesis. Since the zebrafish/tumor xenograft represents an emerging tool in this regard, the present study strives to capitalize on the ease, effectiveness, and the adaptability of this model to quantify tumor angiogenesis. In order to test a range of responses, we chose two different tumorigenic cell lines, the human non-small cell lung carcinoma (H1299) and the mouse lung adenocarcinoma (CL13). Non-tumorigenic 3T3-L1 cells served as negative control. The cells were grafted near to the perivitelline space of the zebrafish embryos and the angiogenic response was analyzed using whole-mount alkaline phosphatase (AP) vessel staining and fluorescence microscopy. Angiogenic activity was scored based on the length and number of the newly formed ectopic vessels and the percentage of embryos with ectopic vessels. At 2 day-post-implantation, we detected a significant increase in the length and number of ectopic vessels with H1299 cell implantation compared to CL13 cell transplantation, both are higher than 3T3-L1 control. We also observed a significantly higher percentage of embryos with ectopic vessels with H1299 and CL13 transplantation compared to the 3T3-L1 control, but this parameter is not as robust and reliable as measuring the length and number of ectopic vessels. Furthermore, the systemic exposure of zebrafish embryos to an anti-angiogenesis drug (PTK 787, inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase) inhibited tumor-induced angiogenesis, suggesting that the assay can be used to evaluate anti-angiogenic drugs. This study implicates the feasibility of using zebrafish xenotransplantation to perform quantitative measurement of the angiogenic activity of cancer cells which can be further extended to measure cancer cell metastasis. This assay represents not only the useful test for patient diagnosis, but also has the potential for evaluating anti-cancer drugs treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.