Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24212493›Full record

ArticlePlanta1989

Phytochrome - all regions marked by a set of monoclonal antibodies reflect conformational changes.

H A Schneider-Poetsch, B Braun, W Rüdiger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H A Schneider-PoetschBotanisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, Gyrhofstrasse 15, D-5000, Köln 41, Federal Republic of Germany.
B Braun
W Rüdiger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies to defined locations on six regions of the phytochrome molecule (from Avena sativa L. or Zea mays L.) were each found to have a different affinity toward the farred-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr) and the red-absorbing form (Pr). The differences were small, but were consistently shown by antibodies which bind to the vicinity of the aminoterminus, the carboxylterminus and to sequences in between. It seems that the conformational differences between Pr and Pfr extend over the whole molecule in as far as it is represented by these regions and the antibodies binding to them.

Identifiers

PMID24212493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.