Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24212421›Full record

ArticlePlanta1989

Tissue slices from living root caps as a model system in which to study cytodifferentiation of polar cells.

W Hensel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

W HenselBotanisches Institut der Universität Bonn, Venusbergweg 22, D-5300, Bonn 1, Federal Republic of Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue slices of living root caps of cress (Lepidium sativum L.), two to three cell layers in thickness, were prepared by a microsurgical procedure. The viability, cellular structures and cytoplasmic movement of the cells were examined in the light microscope. Nuclei, amyloplasts, vacuoles and endoplasmic reticulum were identified and their positions confirmed after fixation and observation of the same cells in the electron microscope. The distribution of microtubules was shown by immunocytochemistry. During germination, microtubules appear first at the distal edges of the statocytes, while in mature statocytes a distal domain of criss-crossed microtubules could be distinguished from a proximal domain with transversally oriented microtubules. Microfilaments in young statocytes form a nuclear enclosure; in mature statocytes bundles of microfilaments fan out into the cell cortex. The transition from statocytes to secretion cells is accompanied by a more pronounced cortical network of microfilaments, while the nucleus-associated microfilaments remain visible. It is suggested that these microfilaments play a role in the positioning of the nucleus and the translocation of endoplasmic reticulum.

Identifiers

PMID24212421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.