Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24212326›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of public health2014

Exploring subgroup effects by socioeconomic position of three effective school-based dietary interventions: the European TEENAGE project.

Nanna Lien, Leen Haerens, Saskia J te Velde, Liesbeth Mercken, Knut-Inge Klepp, Laurence Moore, Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij, Fabrizio Faggiano, Frank J van Lenthe

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors Associated With Unhealthy Snacks Consumption Among Adolescents in Iran's Schools.International journal of health policy and management · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Nanna LienDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway, nanna.lien@medisin.uio.no.
Leen Haerens
Saskia J te Velde
Liesbeth Mercken
Knut-Inge Klepp
Laurence Moore
Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij
Fabrizio Faggiano
Frank J van Lenthe
Cardiff University · GBGhent University · BEUniversity of Oslo · NOEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU1Medical Research Council G0701875Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to explore subgroup effects by high and low socioeconomic position (SEP) of three previously conducted, effective European interventions.

methodsReanalyses stratified by SEP were conducted by the research groups of each study. All studies were school-based: two multi-component interventions targeting intake of fat or fruit and vegetables (FV), and a free breakfast initiative.

resultsComputer-tailored advice affected fat intake among low, but not high SEP girls after 1 year. A multi-component intervention affected the total FV intake in both SEP groups, vegetable intake in low SEP and fruit intake in high SEP across three countries after 1 year, whereas free fruit affected total FV and fruit intake equally in both SEP groups in one country after 2 years. Providing a free healthy breakfast increased consumption of healthy food items only in the low SEP group.

conclusionsReanalysing intervention studies by SEP is a quick and easy way to explore patterns in effects by SEP across interventions. Providing healthy food might be a promising strategy for decreasing social inequalities.

Indexed as

DietFeeding BehaviorAdolescentChildEuropeFemaleFruitHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansMaleSchoolsSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsVegetables

Identifiers

PMID24212326
OpenAlexW2005835413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.