ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2013
Towards generating a patient's timeline: extracting temporal relationships from clinical notes.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- Optimizing Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction With Large Language Models: Comparative Analysis.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- AI solutions to the radiology workforce shortage.npj health systems · 2025Review
- Named Entity Recognition in Electronic Health Records: A Methodological Review.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Typed Markers and Context for Clinical Temporal Relation Extraction.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023Article
- The Revival of the Notes Field: Leveraging the Unstructured Content in Electronic Health Records.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
- Data Processing and Text Mining Technologies on Electronic Medical Records: A Review.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2018Review
- Capturing the Patient's Perspective: a Review of Advances in Natural Language Processing of Health-Related Text.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
- Temporal data representation, normalization, extraction, and reasoning: A review from clinical domain.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2016Review
- Desiderata for computable representations of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015Article
- Scaling drug indication curation through crowdsourcing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Chronology of your health events: approaches to extracting temporal relations from medical narratives.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2013Article
- Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical records include both coded and free-text fields that interact to reflect complicated patient stories. The information often covers not only the present medical condition and events experienced by the patient, but also refers to relevant events in the past (such as signs, symptoms, tests or treatments). In order to automatically construct a timeline of these events, we first need to extract the temporal relations between pairs of events or time expressions presented in the clinical notes. We designed separate extraction components for different types of temporal relations, utilizing a novel hybrid system that combines machine learning with a graph-based inference mechanism to extract the temporal links. The temporal graph is a directed graph based on parse tree dependencies of the simplified sentences and frequent pattern clues. We generalized the sentences in order to discover patterns that, given the complexities of natural language, might not be directly discoverable in the original sentences. The proposed hybrid system performance reached an F-measure of 0.63, with precision at 0.76 and recall at 0.54 on the 2012 i2b2 Natural Language Processing corpus for the temporal relation (TLink) extraction task, achieving the highest precision and third highest f-measure among participating teams in the TLink track.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.