Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24212087›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry2014

Comparison of mRNA splicing assay protocols across multiple laboratories: recommendations for best practice in standardized clinical testing.

Phillip J Whiley, Miguel de la Hoya, Mads Thomassen, Alexandra Becker, Rita Brandão, Inge Sokilde Pedersen, Marco Montagna, Mireia Menéndez, Francisco Quiles, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez and 41 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Cancers · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

51 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Phillip J WhileyGenetics & Computational Biology Division, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia;
Miguel de la Hoya
Mads Thomassen
Alexandra Becker
Rita Brandão
Inge Sokilde Pedersen
Marco Montagna
Mireia Menéndez
Francisco Quiles
Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez
Kim De Leeneer
Anna Tenés
Gemma Montalban
Demis Tserpelis
Toshio Yoshimatsu
Carole Tirapo
Michela Raponi
Trinidad Caldes
Ana Blanco
Marta Santamariña
Lucia Guidugli
Gorka Ruiz de Garibay
Ming Wong
Mariella Tancredi
Laura Fachal
Yuan Chun Ding
Torben Kruse
Vanessa Lattimore
Ava Kwong
Tsun Leung Chan
Mara Colombo
Giovanni De Vecchi
Maria Caligo
Diana Baralle
Conxi Lázaro
Fergus Couch
Paolo Radice
Melissa C Southey
Susan Neuhausen
Claude Houdayer
Jim Fackenthal
Thomas Van Overeem Hansen
Ana Vega
Orland Diez
Rien Blok
Kathleen Claes
Barbara Wappenschmidt
Logan Walker
Amanda B Spurdle
Melissa A Brown
ENIGMA consortium
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ESFundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica · ESGhent University Hospital · BEHong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital · HKInstitut Curie · FRMayo Clinic · USOdense University Hospital · DKQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · USUniversity of Cologne · DEUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Otago · NZAalborg University Hospital · DKBeckman Research InstituteCity of Hope · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Transgenic Mouse FacilityP30CA033572 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON · 1985 to 2026
$86.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA033572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate evaluation of unclassified sequence variants in cancer predisposition genes is essential for clinical management and depends on a multifactorial analysis of clinical, genetic, pathologic, and bioinformatic variables and assays of transcript length and abundance. The integrity of assay data in turn relies on appropriate assay design, interpretation, and reporting.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter investigation to compare mRNA splicing assay protocols used by members of the ENIGMA (Evidence-Based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles) consortium. We compared similarities and differences in results derived from analysis of a panel of breast cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) and breast cancer 2, early onset (BRCA2) gene variants known to alter splicing (BRCA1: c.135-1G>T, c.591C>T, c.594-2A>C, c.671-2A>G, and c.5467+5G>C and BRCA2: c.426-12_8delGTTTT, c.7988A>T, c.8632+1G>A, and c.9501+3A>T). Differences in protocols were then assessed to determine which elements were critical in reliable assay design.

resultsPCR primer design strategies, PCR conditions, and product detection methods, combined with a prior knowledge of expected alternative transcripts, were the key factors for accurate splicing assay results. For example, because of the position of primers and PCR extension times, several isoforms associated with BRCA1, c.594-2A>C and c.671-2A>G, were not detected by many sites. Variation was most evident for the detection of low-abundance transcripts (e.g., BRCA2 c.8632+1G>A Δ19,20 and BRCA1 c.135-1G>T Δ5q and Δ3). Detection of low-abundance transcripts was sometimes addressed by using more analytically sensitive detection methods (e.g., BRCA2 c.426-12_8delGTTTT ins18bp).

conclusionsWe provide recommendations for best practice and raise key issues to consider when designing mRNA assays for evaluation of unclassified sequence variants.

Indexed as

RNA SplicingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansLaboratoriesMultivariate AnalysisPractice Guidelines as TopicRNA Splice SitesSensitivity and SpecificityBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID24212087
PMCPMC4351044
OpenAlexW2104353759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.