Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24212061›Full record

Trial reportPreventive medicine2014

Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.

Mark Dignan, Brent Shelton, Stacey A Slone, Cheri Tolle, Sohail Mohammad, Nancy Schoenberg, Kevin Pearce, Emily Van Meter, Gretchen Ely

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Examining Psychological and Knowledge Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Appalachian Kentucky.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark DignanUniversity of Kentucky, Department of Internal Medicine, 800 Rose Street, Room CC444, Lexington, KY 40536-0093, USA. Electronic address: Mbdign2@email.uky.edu.
Brent SheltonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, USA; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, USA.
Stacey A SloneMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, USA.
Cheri TolleMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, USA.
Sohail MohammadCollege of Public Health, University of Kentucky, USA.
Nancy SchoenbergDepartment of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, USA.
Kevin PearceDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, USA.
Emily Van MeterMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, USA.
Gretchen ElyCollege of Social Work, University of Kentucky, USA.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Structure M.tuberculosis Adenosine Kinase Design Antimicrobial Nucleoside AnalogsR01CA113932 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DIGNAN, MARK B · 2005 to 2009
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS R01 CA113932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis report describes findings from a randomized controlled trial of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in primary care practices in Appalachian Kentucky.

methodsSixty-six primary care practices were randomized to early or delayed intervention groups. The intervention was provided at practices using academic detailing, a method of education where providers receive information on a specific topic through personal contact. Data were collected in cross-sectional surveys of medical records at baseline and six months post-intervention.

resultsA total of 3844 medical records were reviewed at baseline and 3751 at the six-month follow-up. At baselines, colonoscopy was recommended more frequently (43.4%) than any other screening modality, followed by fecal occult blood testing (18.0%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (0.4%), and double-contrast barium enema (0.3%). Rates of documented screening results were higher for all practices at the six-month follow-up for colonoscopy (31.8% vs 29.6%) and fecal occult blood testing (12.2% vs 11.2%). For early intervention practices that recommended screening, colonoscopy rates increased by 15.7% at six months compared to an increase of 2.4% in the delayed intervention practices (p=.01).

conclusionsUsing academic detailing to reach rural primary care providers with a CRC screening intervention was associated with an increase in colonoscopy.

Indexed as

AdultAppalachian RegionColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDirective CounselingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKentuckyMaleMass ScreeningMedical RecordsMiddle AgedPhysicians, Primary CareAppalachiaColorectal cancer screeningPrimary careRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID24212061
PMCPMC3925970
OpenAlexW2077451387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.