Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24211337›Full record

ArticleNanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine2014

Application of a hemolysis assay for analysis of complement activation by perfluorocarbon nanoparticles.

Christine T N Pham, Dennis G Thomas, Julia Beiser, Lynne M Mitchell, Jennifer L Huang, Angana Senpan, Grace Hu, Mae Gordon, Nathan A Baker, Dipanjan Pan and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physiological and Pathological Factors Affecting Drug Delivery to the Brain by Nanoparticles.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Development of a Sensitive Assay to Screen NanoparticlesACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christine T N PhamDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Dennis G ThomasDepartment of Knowledge, Discovery and Informatics, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Julia BeiserDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Lynne M MitchellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jennifer L HuangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Angana SenpanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Grace HuDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Mae GordonDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nathan A BakerDepartment of Knowledge, Discovery and Informatics, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Dipanjan PanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
Gregory M LanzaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Dennis E HourcadeDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: dhourcad@dom.wustl.edu.

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY CENTER VISION RESEARCHP30EY002687 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Philip Raymond Williams · 1985 to 2026
$18.4M
Task Specific Project 3: Diffuse Optical TomographyU54CA136398 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, LIHONG · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
COMPLEMENT CONVERTASE: ASSEMBLY, FUNCTION AND REGULATIONR01AI051436 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOURCADE, DENNIS EMIL · 2003 to 2016
$3.7M
Theranostic Approach to Asthma Using Anti-Angiogenic NanomedicineR01HL113392 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LANZA, GREGORY M, WAGNER, ELIZABETH · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
Characterization/bioinformatics-modeling of nanoparticle:complement interactionsU01NS073457 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HOURCADE, DENNIS EMIL · 2010 to 2012
$3.0M
NEXT GENERATION APPROACHES TO BREAST CANCER USING IMAGE GUIDED DRUG DELIVERYR01CA154737 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LANZA, GREGORY M, PAN, DIPANJAN · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
TARGETED NANOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITISR01AR056468 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PHAM, CHRISTINE T. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
Targeted Nanoparticles of Bismuth Organo Complexes for Spectral CT Imaging of CorR42HL112518 · NHLBI · OCEAN NANOTECH, LLC · PI LANZA, GREGORY M, WANG, YONGQIANG ANDREW · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
Prevention of Bladder Cancer with Broccoli SproutsR21CA100623 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ZHANG, YUESHENG · 2004 to 2005
$466k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NCI NIH HHS CA100623NCI NIH HHS CA136398NCI NIH HHS CA154737NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154737NCI NIH HHS R21 CA100623NCI NIH HHS U54 CA136398NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002687NEI NIH HHS P30 EY 02687NHLBI NIH HHS HL112518NHLBI NIH HHS HL113392NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113392NHLBI NIH HHS R42 HL112518NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051436NIAID NIH HHS R01AI051436NIAMS NIH HHS AR056468NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056468NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS073457NINDS NIH HHS U01NS073457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoparticles offer new options for medical diagnosis and therapeutics with their capacity to specifically target cells and tissues with imaging agents and/or drug payloads. The unique physical aspects of nanoparticles present new challenges for this promising technology. Studies indicate that nanoparticles often elicit moderate to severe complement activation. Using human in vitro assays that corroborated the mouse in vivo results we previously presented mechanistic studies that define the pathway and key components involved in modulating complement interactions with several gadolinium-functionalized perfluorocarbon nanoparticles (PFOB). Here we employ a modified in vitro hemolysis-based assay developed in conjunction with the mouse in vivo model to broaden our analysis to include PFOBs of varying size, charge and surface chemistry and examine the variations in nanoparticle-mediated complement activity between individuals. This approach may provide the tools for an in-depth structure-activity relationship study that will guide the eventual development of biocompatible nanoparticles. FROM THE CLINICAL EDITOR: Unique physical aspects of nanoparticles may lead to moderate to severe complement activation in vivo, which represents a challenge to clinical applicability. In order to guide the eventual development of biocompatible nanoparticles, this team of authors report a modified in vitro hemolysis-based assay developed in conjunction with their previously presented mouse model to enable in-depth structure-activity relationship studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsComplement ActivationFluorocarbonsHemolysisHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesParticle SizeFluorocarbonsComplementHemolysis AssayMouse ModelNanomedicineNanoparticlesPerfluorocarbon

Identifiers

PMID24211337
PMCPMC3966962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.